What's new

Donald Trump, Owner of an NBA Team

You know what everyone thinks? Good to know.
Actually, you said that people think that trump is worse. Not me.

I said that he is worse. It's not just something that people think.
 
In my opinion if Clinton were running against a legitimate candidate she would have no chance. She is extremely corrupt and the only reason anyone is denying it is that they think Trump is worse. America ought to be able to do a lot better than either one of these candidates.

Notwithstanding the anarchy of public opinion replacing the judicial system, the republicans have a very difficult time producing even marginal candidates, let alone inspirational ones. Romney and Ryan would have been amazing this year, but they are the exception. Bush, Palin, and Trump are the other representatives of the party, really? Bush had his moments both good and bad. But the clowns that have come from the republican party have all but given the democrats the presidency. We need more than a one-party system, and the republicans aren't helping that at all.
 
Actually, you said that people think that trump is worse. Not me.

I said that he is worse. It's not just something that people think.
Hmm. Ya got me the first part.

I don't think anybody can be sure who would be the worst president out of the two, though. I'm sad that we're going to find out how bad one of them can be.
 
Notwithstanding the anarchy of public opinion replacing the judicial system, the republicans have a very difficult time producing even marginal candidates, let alone inspirational ones. Romney and Ryan would have been amazing this year, but they are the exception. Bush, Palin, and Trump are the other representatives of the party, really? Bush had his moments both good and bad. But the clowns that have come from the republican party have all but given the democrats the presidency. We need more than a one-party system, and the republicans aren't helping that at all.
There is a greater anarchy in replacing the judicial system with corruption. How anyone could listen to the press conference below by Comey and conclude that his conclusions were just is beyond my comprehension. Remove any reference to Hillary from his comments, and then ask yourself whether the person who he described ought to be eligible to become president of the US. And this is just the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg with her. It does not even deal with the fact that she deleted tens of thousands of emails before turning them over, that she made numerous statements both before and after his investigation that directly conflict with his findings, and that we now know that she definitely intermixed Clinton Foundation business with State Department business. Only someone who is willfully ignoring the facts could possibly deny that she massively violated the public trust, and that she massively profited as a result. It sickens me that we are so immune to corruption that large numbers of people believe that she should remain eligible for the presidency.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dYRUhQdK0E
 
I don't think anybody can be sure who would be the worst president out of the two, though. I'm sad that we're going to find out how bad one of them can be.

In other words, the candidate who has actually demonstrated throughout the election process to literally be the worst candidate the United States has ever known relative to the time and place is close to Clinton. Trump has never in any way demonstrated even normalcy in any respect. Clinton has been very good through the election process. She has actually demonstrated presidential qualities at every level in this process.

The knock on her is nearly always either party policy or that she is crooked (proven by nothing). If a single claim were substantiated, then, that would be something. She's been absolved of any charges (lengthy though they are). 25 years of being pulverized by republicans, but yet there are no proven charges. Guys who listen to talk radio or see a YouTube video are in a much better position to determine Clinton's respective guilt than a dozen CIA agents or the army of republicans trying to "lock her up."

Yet what we can actual prove and see means nothing. She and Trump are virtual equals. Trump can say whatever the hell he wants and they're just about equal. If you want to claim that they are close off of party policies, then that's fine. But off of verifiable conduct, one's just fine, and the other's Ruprecht from Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.

This is how I see the debates playing out. Trump is Reprecht and Michael Caine is the moderator. TRUMP DESERVES THE GENITAL CUFF.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF8QAeQm3ZM
 
There is a greater anarchy in replacing the judicial system with corruption.

If she has broken the law, then he should have recommended charges against her in the end. He is the corrupt one if he fails to bring charges against our politicians when the evidence is sufficient to do so. She screwed up, no question, and we may not have heard the end of this, but I don't condemn someone that has been pronounced innocent of crimes by the head of the FBI, irrespective of his huffing and puffing. If he won't bring charges against her as a criminal, then I won't.
 
If she has broken the law, then he should have recommended charges against her in the end. He is the corrupt one if he fails to bring charges against our politicians when the evidence is sufficient to do so. She screwed up, no question, and we may not have heard the end of this, but I don't condemn someone that has been pronounced innocent of crimes by the head of the FBI, irrespective of his huffing and puffing. If he won't bring charges against her as a criminal, then I won't.
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch just happened to run into each other while waiting for a flight. They discussed only their grandchildren and golf, so nothing to worry about. Ignore the fact that in order for this to happen flight schedules had to be changed, private planes had to be boarded, secret service had to be excused. It was all because these two people who happened to be involved in a high profile case about corruption wanted to talk about their grand kids.

There probably aren't any other similar meetings we're unaware of involving people who were also involved in the situation, so we should just rest easy that Hillary did no wrong despite the fact that the conclusions don't come anywhere close to matching the evidence that was presented.
 
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch just happened to run into each other while waiting for a flight. They discussed only their grandchildren and golf, so nothing to worry about. Ignore the fact that in order for this to happen flight schedules had to be changed, private planes had to be boarded, secret service had to be excused. It was all because these two people who happened to be involved in a high profile case about corruption wanted to talk about their grand kids.

There probably aren't any other similar meetings we're unaware of involving people who were also involved in the situation, so we should just rest easy that Hillary did no wrong despite the fact that the conclusions don't come anywhere close to matching the evidence that was presented.

And this is evidence of what?
 
And this is evidence of what?

Well, it is part of the 15 year old narrative that has been spoon fed to dickless conservatives who've been had the better of by women. Now they hate women. It's not complicated.
 
You were clearly commenting on my post, and throwing out the same unfounded insults you have in the past. But then you claim it is me harassing you?

I wasn't commenting on your post. Your post is just one of millions from guys who hate women and attack Hillary. I was addressing the other 999,999 dudes who have no dick and are scarred of a woman.
 
Hey, joe bag of no dicks, feel free to send me a "**** you" neg rep and then report me again, okay!

You wanna tell me to **** off? Well, I'm game. You can have the nicest day possible for a dickless woman hater. Sorry someone with a vagina got the better of you. They aren't all bad.
 
Hey, joe bag of no dicks, feel free to send me a "**** you" neg rep and then report me again, okay!

You wanna tell me to **** off? Well, I'm game. You can have the nicest day possible for a dickless woman hater. Sorry someone with a vagina got the better of you. They aren't all bad.
I have many female friends and I respect women in general. I have had great female bosses. I do not hold anything whatsoever against women as a sex.

I'm not sure how much you know about what happened in my private life, but the fact that a woman hurt me and my family very badly, and the fact that Hillary Clinton is a woman, is not evidence that my feelings about those two people have anything to do with one another.
 
Tell everyone else. I know what I think of you. You have no dick and you hate women. You're wasting your time on me. Oh, except to report me. I'll take the infraction. Will you post publicly that you reported me? Will you own up to sending me a "**** you" neg rep before this all started?

You wanna say "**** you"? Do it! This is me saying **** you too. Only I do it in the open and I'll keep doing it until you ask for my mercey. So unless you're done...
 
Back
Top