I don't know that Rivers can play a true PG position, but he would be great as a first guy off the bench.
Additionally, the way that Hayward has developed as a playmaking type guard I think Rivers could be very effective as a spot shooter/slasher defending the pg position.
He looks like Jamall Crawford to me. Would you want Crawford as our starting PG? Crawford had better APG in college too.
I think his athleticism is a little bit better, personally.
I'm not saying he would be a perfect fit, just explaining how I could see him playing with the team. Honestly, I don't really like any of the PGs in this draft very well. I think our value is much better on someone like Brad Beal or Quincy Miller. It all depends on where we draft I suppose. Different at 9 vs 15.
They seem pretty similar athletically to me. Neither are elite athletes, but have good quickness for their size combined with unreal ball handling and a love for shooting.
Rivers could become decent at running an offense, imo. The important thing is that he would bring shooting, clutch play, and leadership. And with guys like Hayward, Burks, and Miller on the wings, I don't think it would be as crucial to have an amazing play maker at the PG position.
I don't think we need an amazing player, but I would like to have someone that makes players around him better. I don't see Rivers doing that at all.
I don't think we need an amazing player, but I would like to have someone that makes players around him better. I don't see Rivers doing that at all.
I get what you mean. Who you liking best from the PG prospects at this point?
I guess Marshall, because he definitely makes players better. Just look at what he did his freshman year for UNC when he took over as the starter, night and day difference in the team.
Machado could be also, but I really have no clue to how he plays and he hasn't played anyone great yet.
To me Marshall has more questions than Rivers. I would take Rivers over Marshall.
As a player I would, as a PG, no.
How many true PG's are starting in the league? I would say out of the top 10 I would only put DWill and CP3 as pure points. All the rest are more of a shooting PG. Am I missing someone else?
Steve Nash, Rondo, Kyrie Irving, Rubio (off the top of my head).
As of right now Rivers isn't a PG at all. He has poor assist numbers (on a team that is lights out from deep, you think he would be able to get more on just kick outs) and averages more TO's than assist.
Yea, I wasn't thinking about Nash at all. Irving is not a pure point. Rubio is not a top 10 IMO. Rondo is in a class all his own. I think that Rivers comes from the Westbrook/Rose mold. It took both of them a couple of years to understand the PG role and even now they still don't do a great job of being a pure point.