What's new

Following potential 2017 draftees...

Why are you trying to make this an argument? I stated there is a correlation (there is and it's obvious to anyone with a brain, which I guess you might not have). I never made a statement as to how strong the correlation is. I'm not going to run the math on it. You are welcome to do so. Have fun.

And I stated you can't demonstrate what the correlation is. And you can't. You keep spinning your tires talking about people with brains. People with brains can see that you're wrong and full of ****(as usual), and don't wanna lose even though you're fighting a losing argument.

Again, WHAT IS THE CORRELATION? Whats the fraction, Mr. Vitruvian Man??
 
Expose myself? this ******* is claiming a correlation but can't demonstrate what the correlation is in it's simplest form. What more do you need to know??

don't quit your day job [MENTION=253]Saint Cy of JFC[/MENTION]

[MENTION=2500]BTP[/MENTION] This guy is a great example of why people from other countries say Americans are dumb and proud. Right?

you are both being ugly americans
 
And I stated you can't demonstrate what the correlation is. And you can't. You keep spinning your tires talking about people with brains. People with brains can see that you're wrong and full of ****(as usual), and don't wanna lose even though you're fighting a losing argument.

Again, WHAT IS THE CORRELATION? Whats the fraction, Mr. Vitruvian Man??

lmao

You start using terms like "clean vs unclean correlation". Then you state "case by case basis" like individual cases change the fact that correlation is based on a large set of data. Individual cases dont have to "hold up" for a correlation to be present. Just go back to scouting high schoolers. This is amateur hour.
 
there is a correlation between standin reach and height. Is it a fact yes is it true for every one no. let me ask this question who is going to have the higher standing reach a 5' person with a 7' wing span or a 7' person with a 5' wing span?
 
lmao

You start using terms like "clean vs unclean correlation". Then you state "case by case basis" like individual cases change the fact that correlation is based on a large set of data. Individual cases dont have to "hold up" for a correlation to be present. Just go back to scouting high schoolers. This is amateur hour.

You can't demonstrate what your talking about or I'll smash it to pieces 100x over.

You are here perpetuating lies for the sake of your own hubris. Checkmate.
 
Tyler Lydon showed he's comfortable from NBA range, shooting 80% from the left corner and left break on spot-ups, about as good as anyone shooting today. John Collins showing he can shoot with range too.
 
Tyler Lydon showed he's comfortable from NBA range, shooting 80% from the left corner and left break on spot-ups, about as good as anyone shooting today.

He helped himself out by having some solid measurements too. Really needs to add strength though. He is going to get bullied worse than Trey Lyles.
 
I come here to perpetuate lies? this lame has no direct correlation. he's not even man enough to respond directly to my questions that I've been repeating.

I've got nothing to hide. Cy on the other hand is hiding his "correlations" most simplest form.

well i replied and you ignored my correlation
 
Back
Top