is it?
u convince me, my brother sir.
20 pts on 18 shots?
really?
BTW;
a guy like Favors should be collecting more than 5 rebs in 28 minutes!
He is way better than this!
Uhh, Alec Burks averages 10.8 shots per game and 13.8 points per game, 3 more points than FGA's. It's not great efficiency, but it's not bad.
That equates to 1.28 pps, which is above the league average
Sent from the JazzFanz app
Yeah, that was my point.
He said Burke having 20 points on 17 shots was inefficient. Was saying that is the average of our most scoring efficient wing.
jope was referring to burks
jope was referring to burks
no, it is def. not.
I was at the game tonight and there were so many terrible calls. I cheered, but wasn't sad with the L.
8-18 shooting for a total 20 points is inefficient.for guards? it is not a bad night.
8-18 shooting for a total 20 points is inefficient.
4-12 is plain bad (=Burks)
edit: besides, I dislike the idea that their best PG is a ballhog! Burks on the other hand is da man! He has been huge this season.
The only thing to me though is imagine this scenario. A player scores 10 points on 5-10 shooting. That is 50%, which would be incredibly good of a fg%. I guess I'm not factoring in 3 pointers and free throws though.
Oh good grief.
Listen, people that discuss the things that Kanter does poorly are not haters, they're just realistic and pointing out flaws. Learn the freaking difference. You can disagree with somebody and not hate them, you can discuss flaws and not be a hater. This isn't that difficult.
20 points on 17 shots is fairly good efficiency.
no, it is def. not.
20 points on 17 shots is fairly good efficiency.
Points per shot is ****ing stupid.