What's new

Jazz notify Wesley Matthews they will NOT match

No such thing as overpaid. It's market value.

So when ARod received 10 years, 250+M from the Rangers, and no one else was in the same ballpark, it's simply market-value? No.

The market is set after the offer is accepted. Therefore, the teams dictate the market, not the players. Sure a player can demand x years and dollars but until some teams ponies up, the market's not set.
 
So when ARod received 10 years, 250+M from the Rangers, and no one else was in the same ballpark, it's simply market-value? No.

The market is set after the offer is accepted. Therefore, the teams dictate the market, not the players. Sure a player can demand x years and dollars but until some teams ponies up, the market's not set.

It only takes one party to dictate market value.
 
So A-Rod's market value was what the Rangers set it at? For them sure, league-wide, not necessarily. But I guess you're right and teams never overpay.

Break it down to a more personal level. Put something on ebay for sale. It only takes one bidder to set market value.
 
Break it down to a more personal level. Put something on ebay for sale. It only takes one bidder to set market value.

Correct. And perhaps I'm diverging from the traditional definition of market value. However, for me, just because one team, or person in your example, chooses to pay much higher than anyone else would have for a "product" does not mean that is the actual value of that product on a larger scale.
 
It does not mean that that was the worth valuated by the market and hence an offer at that price came in. The price came in to set that market value.
 
Correct. And perhaps I'm diverging from the traditional definition of market value. However, for me, just because one team, or person in your example, chooses to pay much higher than anyone else would have for a "product" does not mean that is the actual value of that product on a larger scale.

Of course it does. Bro. It's like a Basquiat painting. Just because one person can afford to pay the price it goes for, does not mean, it's worth less then it went for.
 
What if someone did? Would that set the market value of Civics at 100k a pop?

It would set the market value of that particular Civic...yes. Who knows, maybe that specific Civic belonged to Al Gore or Ke$ha.
 
I think it's clear that Portland was bluffing. If we made a reasonable offer in 4 mill / yr range to begin with, then Portland may not have made any offer and just let it go because they might've figured the Jazz had set their ceiling and they didn't really want or need Matthews, they just wanted to screw the Jazz.
No they would not have let it go. The Jazz said Matthews was priority number one, so if the Jazz offered 4 mil/yr Portland woulda just upped the offer with the first year poison pill bonus - probably the same 33M/5 years offer. You said yourself Portland just wanted to screw the Jazz.
In not making an offer, everyone gets screwed: Matthews, the Jazz, and Portland. Making an offer was the one option to prevent this.
Wrong. Matthews makes a lot more than 20M/4 years. Jazz get a more proven player in Bell. Bell is a great 3 pt shooter (jazz need), he's a top defensive player (nba need what with all the SG superstars), and he brings veteran, take no-****-from-nobody attitude (Jazz need). Some are worried about his age but he's had a lot of time off the past two years what his his wrist surgery (non shooting hand). He didn't log many minutes his first two season in Philly. For the next 3 years I'm confident he's going to be a stud for the Jazz.

But I guess Portland's bluff didn't work out for them. 2 out of 3 ain't bad.
 
Blazers will regret this deal if they can't use Wes and a package to get Paul. We are paying a proven guy over a span of many years 3 years and 10 million. They are paying a guy who could be good but likely won't get much of a chance with them 5 years and 34 million. Eat it Blazers.
Good points. WE also had 3 starters at two positions (AK, CJ and Matthews). Now we have two defined starters and a guy knowing he's coming in as a sub or emergency starter.

Best of luck to Matthews. He'll still be one of my favorite players. If I could, I'd give him a STANDING "O" when Portland comes to the ESA (I live in LA, so I don't go to any games in SLC). I hope Matthews plays great for 82 games. Just have Roy play poorly when they face the Jazz;-)

And screw Portland. They played chicken and KOC and Greg didn't swerve. Agree 100% on matching for Millsap and not matching for Matthews. KOC and Greg get an A for their off-season moves this season, including the darft. Jefferson is going to make us say "Carlos, who?" Raja will be ringing the bell again. And "The Butler" is going to be serving up points for us on a platter.
 
If the Jazz thought Matthews was the future at SG, they probably wouldn't have drafted Hayward with their lottery pick. Matthews is probably going to be a back-up, if he's on a good team.
 
It would set the market value of that particular Civic...yes. Who knows, maybe that specific Civic belonged to Al Gore or Ke$ha.

You obviously mistake market value to market price.

Market value is a concept distinct from market price, which is “the price at which one can transact”, while market value is “the true underlying value” according to theoretical standards.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_value
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_price
 
What a difference a year makes.
Last year Paul Millsap was resigned for 4 yrs $32 million.
This year Luis Scola gets 5 years $47 million. (who would your rather have?)
And now Wes Matthews gets 5 yrs $34 million.
 
According to Randy R, speaking on KFAN today, the Jazz have still not decided they will not match. Sounds likely but not a done deal.
 
Back
Top