If you could read, you'd understand what I was saying. Maybe next time.
Dunce.
+3 for the wicked burn.
If you could read, you'd understand what I was saying. Maybe next time.
Dunce.
Does he need 35 minutes per game? 40?CJ deserves playing time after how he played late last year.
What reports are saying late December? 12 effective minutes of Diaw is worth AK? Really? I'd rather just give those 12 minutes to Memo (when he's ready), Fes and Sap, and hold onto AK (he'll be more effective in those 8 minutes, and better than the rest of our wings).
Maybe you should stop digging that hole.
Uh, the difference in their salaries is 8mil. The Jazz are about 6mil over the tax. 8 + 6 = 19? If the Jazz were 13mil over the tax, Locke would be right. They're not, and Locke can't add.I'm right and everyone is wrong.
Does he need 35 minutes per game? 40?
Locke can't add.
CJ deserves playing time after how he played late last year.
Uh, the difference in their salaries is 8mil. The Jazz are about 6mil over the tax. 8 + 6 = 19? If the Jazz were 13mil over the tax, Locke would be right. They're not, and Locke can't add.
Idiots outing themselves all over the place.
What reports are saying late December? 12 effective minutes of Diaw is worth AK? Really? I'd rather just give those 12 minutes to Memo (when he's ready), Fes and Sap, and hold onto AK (he'll be more effective in those 8 minutes, and better than the rest of our wings).
Maybe you should stop digging that hole.
So we're trading away AK to pay $9mil for 15 minutes of Diaw (and 0 when Memo's back)? Even better.
Locke can't add.
Us? At this point, the only people effected by AK's contract are the Millers and the Kirilenkos. After the trade, The Jazz would have no more flexibility than before (depending on what AK sings for next summer, the Jazz might possibly have LESS flexibility).AK's contract is killing us and if I was the Miller family I would trade him too.
What are you on? This isn't a move to open up playing time, this is very obviously a ****** attempt at saving salary. And why should we not compare them as 3s, anyway. By my count, the Jazz have 0 real SFs if AK's gone (CJs not proven to be of ideal size, Hayward hasn't proven anything, Diaw is likely too slow) and nearly $30 million between three guys at the 4 if Diaw's here. Your logic in this post is baffling.
Paying Diaw $9mil next year is gonna make the Jazz unable to sign AK, even at a reasonable price.6. Has anyone thought of the possibility that AK may even come back and sign with the Jazz next summer when he becomes a free agent (ala Raja Bell)? It doesn't mean that Dever has him locked up for his entire career. Why wouldn't AK want to come back? We've over paid him for all those years may be he would want to repay us for that.
Fire away..
Uh, the difference in their salaries is 8mil. The Jazz are about 6mil over the tax. 8 + 6 = 19? If the Jazz were 13mil over the tax, Locke would be right. They're not, and Locke can't add.
Idiots outing themselves all over the place.
Uh, the difference in their salaries is 8mil. The Jazz are about 6mil over the tax. 8 + 6 = 19? If the Jazz were 13mil over the tax, Locke would be right. They're not, and Locke can't add.
Idiots outing themselves all over the place.