Because unless the world goes to war quickly here and somehow Obama is viewed as a man of strength or Ben Bernanke finds the right blend of fairy dust ink to pump up the economy via printing excess money(figuratively of course) to its proper place, it's a losing bet.
Amazing things happen when you leave Provo...
White/Pinkman 2012
One of the things that happens is that you meet alot of dumbasses. I know because I have left "Provo"
Also, crime rates go up, shorts get shorter, and cola becomes caffeinated.
Not always a good thing. Sometime you cry out and shield your eyes.
Romney has been pressing the issue in an ad and on the campaign trail. He told EWTN that any legislation he proposed would be evaluated according to “its impact on religious freedom.
And....
The *** kissing for votes continues...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9d787e-ec9f-11e1-866f-60a00f604425_story.html
I wonder what the reaction would be if Romney said that he'd take any legislation proposed to be evaluated by some Quorum of the Twelve according to its impact on religious freedom?
Food for thought
Amazing things happen when you leave Provo...
And....
The *** kissing for votes continues...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9d787e-ec9f-11e1-866f-60a00f604425_story.html
I wonder what the reaction would be if Romney said that he'd take any legislation proposed to be evaluated by some Quorum of the Twelve according to its impact on religious freedom?
Food for thought
Not always a good thing. Sometime you cry out and shield your eyes.
https://www.theblaze.com/stories/el...in-big-in-2012-and-its-been-right-since-1980/
I thought Obama was supposed to win this one "comfortably".
Our model was developed after the 2008 election. The only election that we forecast is the 2012 election. When we populate the model with data from each of the election years from 1980 through 2008, we correctly estimate the winner in each of those elections.
Pretty lame that this 'model' has become so newsworthy. Seriously.
I posted about this in Pearl's thread but this is being reported completely incorrectly. The model has not existed since 1980. One of the model's authors was a junior in college in 1980. The other was in middle school. It's a brand new model that would retroactively have predicted outcomes correctly in elections since 1980. Of course those outcomes had already occurred when they were making the model so they've really just fitted the model to past results. To date the model has predicted not a single election.
For serious! Read the paper yourself: https://polisci.colorado.edu/images/s...12forecast.pdf
EDIT: One of the paper's authors has acknowledged that the model did not successfully "predict" any previous elections.
https://hotair.com/greenroom/archiv...icted-last-8-presidents-picks-romney-in-2012/
It's that mainstream media I'm always hearing about. Promoting bogus stories that are positive for the GOP and keeping the liberals down.
Or something. I always get confused about how this is supposed to go.