What's new

Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Organs

Link?

I would like to see this hell report for myself. I wasnt aware that hells pr released statements about what they wanted taught in schools.
not really a report saw this a few weeks ago about schools teaching. gender identity, sexual identity n sex ed class. just google those words.
so you can choose which sources cater to your political identity.
enough sources from left and right.
i assume washington post is pretty neutral so i give u this one
of course headline it reads transgender issues, but if you read the comprehensive articles about it you yourself can find. it covers any mental disorder the left considers normal in the new cirriculum including gay homosexual relations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...84c7c2-1c14-11e5-93b7-5eddc056ad8a_story.html
 
my problem with this murder crap is by making the taxpayer pay, you are ine ffect making everybody complicit in this heinous act of murder.

That's fine. Because the government's hands were bound to help a woman who didn't want a pregnancy, she's now enslaved to living a lifestyle not of her choosing for 9 months. Which is, in effect, causing the government to pay for a heinous act of slavery, kidnapping, and battery.

And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.
 
That's fine. Because the government's hands were bound to help a woman who didn't want a pregnancy, she's now enslaved to living a lifestyle not of her choosing for 9 months. Which is, in effect, causing the government to pay for a heinous act of slavery, kidnapping, and battery.

And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.

did she get raped?

did she chose to spread her legs!

are we talking about a case fo rape or a case of where a woman CHOOSE to have SEX?

if she got raped yes the criminal justice system should prosecute and get te rapist to pay or the government.


but if she chose to sprea dher legs then why the **** should taxpayers who dont want to pay for it pay for it?
 
That's fine. Because the government's hands were bound to help a woman who didn't want a pregnancy, she's now enslaved to living a lifestyle not of her choosing for 9 months. Which is, in effect, causing the government to pay for a heinous act of slavery, kidnapping, and battery.

And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.

Depending on that exact details of each case i'd agree or disagree.

But Dutch is horrendous.
 
And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.

I actually find myself to be corrected. It's not murder. By definition, murder: the crime of deliberately killing a person.

It's a good thing it's legal, because it almost met the definition of murder. You know, the part where it's deliberately killing a person.

Is it ok to call it, slaughtering, butchering, killing, massacring or is that not appropriate either?

In all seriousness though, I understand why people abort their kids (in most circumstances.) The part I don't understand is where people just can't admit that it's taking an innocent life and make it seem like no big deal. That part ****ing bothers me.
 
I actually find myself to be corrected. It's not murder. By definition, murder: the crime of deliberately killing a person.

It's a good thing it's legal, because it almost met the definition of murder. You know, the part where it's deliberately killing a person.

Is it ok to call it, slaughtering, butchering, killing, massacring or is that not appropriate either?

In all seriousness though, I understand why people abort their kids (in most circumstances.) The part I don't understand is where people just can't admit that it's taking an innocent life and make it seem like no big deal. That part ****ing bothers me.

I can totally respect that.

Given the situation plopped into my lap, I'm not sure what I would or would not be able to do. But if my wife/girlfriend/love slave/trout ends up pregnant, I'd much rather them have a doctor than a coat hanger.
 
Better to just throw the organs in the ground so no one benefits I guess. That will show em!
 
byu that definition if dudes got money in the bank they are not using
i can rob them!

why let the money sit in a bank

Maybe one day some of these baby organs will play a part in finding a cure for whatever dumb *** disease of the brain you have. One can hope.
 
Dutch is right. Baby organs belong to the baby, not Planned Parenthood.

Well, liberals might still believe in slavery I guess, the fundamental idea that a person or a government can own a human.
 
Dutch is right. Baby organs belong to the baby, not Planned Parenthood.

Well, liberals might still believe in slavery I guess, the fundamental idea that a person or a government can own a human.

A dead person, especially a dead baby, doesn't own anything. I'm not all for abortion, but whenever I see some **** parent or a kid living a horrible life because they were born into it I wish the parent would have aborted as soon as they knew they were pregnant. While the "baby" was still a nothing.

If dutch wants to go for analogies, it would be more like "I'm going to throw away this food instead of giving it to a hungry person." Its going in the ground, might as well get some good out of an otherwise ****ty situation.
 
So how do all of you anti "murder" folks feel about in vitro fertilization? What about all those embryos that get frozen and eventually disposed of?

Are you consistent in your morals? Or is it only murder in one case but not the other?
 
So how do all of you anti "murder" folks feel about in vitro fertilization? What about all those embryos that get frozen and eventually disposed of?

Are you consistent in your morals? Or is it only murder in one case but not the other?

The right wing knows where the line is for everyone and expects everyone to stand behind it.
 
So how do all of you anti "murder" folks feel about in vitro fertilization? What about all those embryos that get frozen and eventually disposed of?

Are you consistent in your morals? Or is it only murder in one case but not the other?

not against in vitro. medical procedures that improve lives and or health(in this case by producing a family) without taking away someone else lives are ok.

frozen embryo. never thought about that.

btw the problem why abortion debate has began to heat up is because of universal healthcare. and ofcourse this "scandal"



if you think it is inconsistent feel free too. i could explain what you dont get. but seems like people dont listen to me around these here parts.

case in point broncster thinking i am against gay mariage. but i am government meddling into a religious institution
 
wouldn't we rather be safe than sorry.

focus on "pregnancy prevention" instead of "abortion"
what if we find out a fetus feels pain after 1 week 2 weeks or just at 8.9 months?
shouldn't we as society rather be safe then sorry.

is it legally murder(depending on what country you live in)? in usa it is not legally considered murder?
but is it morally murder? depends on if the baby is alive and feels pain or not. shouldn't we as society reduce suffering. if I shoot a gun in the air i might kill someone (by accident). but shouldn't abortion be illegal(with exception of rape/incest and severe health issues to mother) just because we might kill a living being for no reason whatsoever?

74% of abortions the reason given = "Having a baby would dramatically change my life".
why the **** did you have unprotected sex then?

and why the **** do we have to pay for your choices in the bedroom.

if you wanna do abortion fine go ahead. but don't force other people to participate.
it is just sad that your own kid gets murdered.


lets just try and focus on PREGNANCY PREVENTION!
 
Back
Top