Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
No way does he believe half the crap he says. The Corbin love is so odd.Holy crap. Is there an ignore feature on this site?
No way does he believe half the crap he says. The Corbin love is so odd.Holy crap. Is there an ignore feature on this site?
Exum is not going to make much of a difference offensively, He couldn't shoot straight last season. He's not going to turn into Steph Curry.
This is just stupid. What we got was a truckload of games missed due to injury, a weak bench that DL chose not to improve in the off season, and a bunch of very close losses.
Corbin did not have the players respect or the ability or flexibility to adapt to in game situations. He ran the old Jazz offense, albeit not well. I watched him coach in SL and saw it then. Corbin was not the future, I wholeheartedly disagree with Frank on that.
However, Quin's offense is not good. I encourage anyone to watch old Jazz games from 01 to 2009(post hand check/illegal d era for fair comparison) to see how many easy, wide open shots our offense created. I'd recommend games from the 05-06 season when are roster was not good. Then watch Snyder's offense and tell me if you are really happy with what it creates. I am impressed with Hayward and Hood's ability to score and break down defenses one on one, which they have to with these sets.
His job was to develop the young players. He wasn't being judged by victories, but again and again he buried the young players beneath vets who meant nothing to this team's future. He proved himself completely incapable of seeing the big picture. And was there ever a worse post game interview? If so, I haven't heard it. He was unlistenable. It was nothing but cliche and platitude in pure monotone. I'll bet the players felt the same way.Corbin's offense maximized the talent he had. I proved this statistically with specific play stats back then. We complained about it, and it was hard to watch, but at the end of the season he was visionary in his play calling and rotation build. How can anyone argue with that?
Also hate how you say he didn't have the respect of the players because he benched that bitch Roger Braille. The best decision he ever made.
His job was to develop the young players. He wasn't being judged by victories, but again and again he buried the young players beneath vets who meant nothing to this team's future. He proved himself completely incapable of seeing the big picture. And was there ever a worse post game interview? If so, I haven't heard it. He was unlistenable. It was nothing but cliche and platitude in pure monotone. I'll bet the players felt the same way.
Injuries are a poor excuse.
The Jazz have had one ONE good stretch this season, against weak teams and on a 6 game home stretch. We haven't been better than 5-5 in a 10 game stretch all season. Before injury and after.
He sacrificed the team's defensive development to showcase what he could do with subpar vets.
The front office made it clear they wanted a team with a defensive identity. If that's a stupid goal then it's the FOs fault for having a stupid goal.
Corbin refused to work towards that goal. He was stupid. The Jazz organization would have been loyal to him had he been loyal to them. He tried to use his opportunity as Utah's head coach to build a resume for his next head coaching gig.
Obviously he was coaching with a foot out the door or else he would have, for better or worse, done what the front office told him to do.
So here we are, with a new head coach and an offense that looks like trash most nights. But did this head coach develop a defensive identity? Yes he did. He did what he was asked to do. If that is bad then it's on the front office, because they got what they asked for.
I hope that having developed this team's defensive identity, as requested, the team will have more faith in Quin and let him take the next step in whatever direction he wants.
Good point. Teams need no time to gel together. If someone comes back from a injury they should automatically be at peak physical condition. You sir are a basketball genius. Corbin forever.
Is it speculation that I think he was more boring than listening to paint dry?None of this fan speculation and ranting is true.
That's complete speculation, J. Think like a business person. What would you have done after Boozer left and then the D-Will blow-up when a whole lot of fans thought there was championship potential?
The way I see it, the Jazz needed to win while also developing young talent in order to sell something to fans. Corbin developed young talent just fine. How did he not? Hayward and everyone else under his tutelage are doing just fine. The playing time theory is nonsense outside of the idea of figuring out how your players work together. The development of these players alone has proven that (Gobert and Favors in particular).
He also tried numerous things on defense to hide Al Jefferson's liabilities. Reference the Bill Simmons article and such.
Then he had to play the #3 draft pick over Gobert. We all know how that went.
Final point. The "subpar vets" were much better than what was currently developing. The Millers had to win to sell tickets at that time, regardless of what lifelong fans wanted. Fans got sick of it and the Jazz finally went into rebuild mold as the fans were chanting for. However, they still had assets to attempt a return on and were stuck. Corbin got fired over it.
You're right that it is speculation to a large degree, but the front office did say publicly numerous times that they were not evaluating Corbin based on wins and losses but on his ability to develop a defensive identity. They said that much publicly. I can only speculate on what they discussed with Corbin privately and also what they really considered before letting him go. But I do know that he didn't develop a defensive identity. Maybe that would have been impossible with the roster he had to work with, but from my couch it didn't look like he was willing to even try.