OK, I can't account for the refs, so I won't comment on that.
But why oh why do you keep talking about the weather? Are you implying that Virginia didn't have to put up with the same exact weather, therefore it was an unfair advantage to Virginia?
I just don't get it. Why are you talking about something that affected both teams?
I'm not saying the weather affected byu more or less than virginia.
Just saying it changed the game, made it a little crazier and brought more chance into the equation.
Look at it like this.
Lets say utah is playing oregon.
Now oregon would be big favorites and everyone would give the utes no chance.
Now it rains like crazy on gameday and there is a huge delay the combinatnion of which causes more chaos.
Now oregon would still be favored but utah could hope that oregon would play sloppy and maybe lose some fumbled and have some bad snaps ect.
Meanwhile maybe the utes luckily don't have those same type of issues
Here is main point.
That type of wild weather can even the playing field a little.... not a ton but a little.
I think ute fans would much rather play oregon in a monsoon than a dome with perfect conditions.
I believe that if byu played virginia next week with hoffman in the lineup and perfect weather that they would win... I understand if you disagree with that.
Byu did gain a lot more yards than virginia but all the unusual crazy plays caused in part by weather happened to go virginias way.
And yes byus offense sucked but thier offense and defense both playedbetter statiscally than virginia