TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Smush Parker
Not sure if this already got posted:
Jerry Zgoda: To get an idea of the market remaining for SGs-- i.e. Ronnie Brewer, etc. -- Randy Foye just agreed to a 1-year, $2.5M deal w/ Utah Twitter
Doesn't sound bad to me.
Well he does touch the ball a lot. Change the stat to FT attempt per shot and I'm pretty sure Al would be one of the worst in the league.Are you trying to tell me that Jefferson went to the line more often than someone else in the NBA? I don't buy it. I think your data was corrupted.
And look at Assist to Turnover ratio for Centers. Guess who's #1?Well he does touch the ball a lot. Change the stat to FT attempt per shot and I'm pretty sure Al would be one of the worst in the league.
And look at Assist to Turnover ratio for Centers. Guess who's #1?
I'll give you a hint: he plays for Utah and is often referred to as a "black hole."
Yet, every other center in the NBA is not judged by the same criteria. Ball goes inside, it's a big's job to score.Stop holding onto this stat Mo. We've all seen his play and it's not all about stats.
I guess if Jefferson is a "black hole," then the same has to be said of Dwight Howard, Bynum, Hibbert, etc. None of those guys pass as much as Al, nor as effectively (i.e. more turnovers).
I made no claims about defense. I'll admit Jefferson is weak defensively. But referring to him as a "black hole" on offense is simply not the case when compared against other centers in the league.This is all I needed to read on your argument. Howard, Bynum, and Hibbert play WAY better defense than Big Al. Stats aren't everything, especially considering there primarily offensive. A center helps on defense more than any other player on the floor, therefore affecting that end of the floor more than any other player. If I am building a winning team, a defensive center is far superior to a offensive patty cake.
![]()
Which one do you like the most and/or think the actual Jazz depth chart will look like?
...well, any lineup we use with Jefferson on the floor is going to be weak, very weak defensively! Until we get rid of Jefferson....we might as well slit our throats and be done with it!
I believe this is exactly the reason the Jazz signed 3 very good defensive and offensive guards this offseason.
Marvin and Mo I believe will be the most effective at helping Jefferson out here.
Not to mention Favors will continue to be more dominant defensively as well.
Could it be that he and his uncle are asking for more than $10M/per? Everyone acts like a player will sign for exactly what we offer him. After seeing the deals for Wallace, Humphries and even AK, I'd be asking the Jazz for $14M if I were Millsap (and hoping to negotiate down to 4/$48M).There is no reason why the Jazz haven't signed Millsap to a 4 year 40 million dollar deal. The guy is clearly worth it, especially considering the Nets just signed Humphries for more than that.
Could it be that he and his uncle are asking for more than $10M/per? Everyone acts like a player will sign for exactly what we offer him. After seeing the deals for Wallace, Humphries and even AK, I'd be asking the Jazz for $14M if I were Millsap (and hoping to negotiate down to 4/$48M).
That could very well be the case now. That's why I think Millsap is gone and Al will be here for a long time.
I predict that Millsap will stay and BigAl will go after this upcoming season.
Wow! What's not to like? A 6'0" combo guard? His career 42%/33% marks? Though he has shot 37.5% the last two seasons I suppose. If he keeps his mouth shut, I'm fine with it but I think we needed a 5 more. Perhaps this is a sign a trade is in the works? Williams/Tinsley/Watson/Hayward/Burks/Murphy and now Lowry?
Burks is gonna get screwed in all this I have a feeling.
Everyone should ignore my post. I looked up Lowry like a dumbass. That said, is this really what we needed? Poor Burks.
Yeaah I'm not worried about Burks' place yet. After he dominated summer league I don't think they rushed to sign someone to take his minutes. There's always the Corbin factor to worry about though
...unless of course they're trading him. LOL. Riot!
Dominated? I wouldn't go that far. He played well but this signing could put his *** on the bench more than any of us want.
Or on the bench? I mean, does anyone really think we're closing games with Foye? Just sayin'. I actually like the pickup but man oh man, Burks is gonna get screwed and this board is going to melt down.
Or maybe this is a harbinger of Jefferson, Millsap and Burks for Dwight.
Burks was a rookie who didn't have the benefit of summer league or a real training camp and only two preseason games. I'm guessing he wasn't ready to play big minutes, but as time went on he earned more and more time, and often finished games. Your acting as though this signing means Burks will never get off the bench. My point is if Burks shows he's worthy of extra playing time or starting, then Burks will get his regardless of this signing.
agree
Let me introduce you to ty corbin.
You say if a player deserves minutes he will get them. Remember when favors was our best player and the most likely candidate to be our franchise player? Then remember how favors would get less than 20 minutes per game? Remember when tinsley was outplaying watson, but corbin kept playing watson ahead of tinsley cause watson was more experienced in the jazz system? And again remember when corbin was playing bell (one of the worst players in the league) ahead of burks? I dont care if burks was a raw rookie with no training camp, he was still the better option than bell.