What's new

Sources: Utah has expressed interest in re-acquring Deron Williams

Love Dwill but Exum is our back up PG, and really starting to come on.

I've said it already in this thread, but I don't see why Hill, DWill and Exum can't play together. They all can play on and off the ball. They all have position versatility. They all bring something different to the table. You can have any of the two on the floor at the same time.
 
I personally don't think DAL will trade DWill. They're still in the playoff hunt, and clearly Cuban is confident in being a player in the FA market. See how easily they were able to get Harrison Barnes to sign with them.
 
I personally don't think DAL will trade DWill. They're still in the playoff hunt, and clearly Cuban is confident in being a player in the FA market. See how easily they were able to get Harrison Barnes to sign with them.

If they can get any sort of decent return, which is questionable, then I'd pull the trigger but If I'm running Dallas of the PG's they've got now he'd be the one I'd look to bring back as a vet backup next year...
 
Funny to see CP3's rumored to be signing a $200MM deal with the Clips while Derons rumored to be getting swapped for peanuts and bubblegum
 
If they can get any sort of decent return, which is questionable, then I'd pull the trigger but If I'm running Dallas of the PG's they've got now he'd be the one I'd look to bring back as a vet backup next year...

It's really strange. Is Cuban that stubborn? Can't he take 1 year off to tank and get a future PG?


It must be the kind of person/businessman that he is. He won't even take a 1 year setback to go forward 3-4 steps. Personally I don't think it's good business.


GSW owners did it right when the tanked to get Harrison Barnes (at our expense), and re-set that year. Barnes wasn't pivotal but he provided an injection of talent that catapulted them to where they are today.
 
It's really strange. Is Cuban that stubborn? Can't he take 1 year off to tank and get a future PG?


It must be the kind of person/businessman that he is. He won't even take a 1 year setback to go forward 3-4 steps. Personally I don't think it's good business.


GSW owners did it right when the tanked to get Harrison Barnes (at our expense), and re-set that year. Barnes wasn't pivotal but he provided an injection of talent that catapulted them to where they are today.

The Mavs going for it the last few years really isn't any worse than the Jazz going for it this year. Similarly misguided situations, just at different stages of the process. you know, minus the championship (or even single playoff game) win when it comes to Hay..

They were trying to get help for their aging superstar who already led them to the promised land in hopes to make one final push..

They out-performed expectations for years running prior to that...

Maybe they're waiting for this years crop of PG's?
 
Jazz lost the game to Dallas that started the skid before the All Star break because they didn't trust any PG to handle the ball late in the game with Hill out. I'm not necessarily advocating for DWill, as much as I want a veteran PG for the playoffs. Wouldn't be surprised at all the see Utah pick up a guy to fill that role. Don't know why, but my gut feeling is that Ricky Rubio might be a dark horse candidate to end up in Utah. Deron is the smokescreen, while Rubio is the target kind of deal.

interesting with Minny looking at D-Rose.

D-Will, though is what Utah needs: shooting, passing, defense, and leadership. 2nd unit, though, might be hard for D-Will to swallow when talking about him coming back to a team he almost led to a championship. Will fans accept him? Would he accept a bench role? Hill has shown he can play with a two PG offense and defense (with Monta Ellis, back in Indiana), and D-Will has shown he can do the same (for instance, playing with JJ Barea in Dallas). But, would the depth D-Will would immediately provide be enough to counter the first string talent of Golden State, San An, Houston, or the Clippers? I think yes. Yes against the Clippers, yes against Houston, yes against San Antonio, and, damn, I don't think any team can overpower Golden State's first string.... Still, giving D-Will a shot at doing it seems to be a great boost to the Jazz come playoffs.
 
It makes no sense to bring DWill back...unless you aren't going to keep Exum.

So, the real question is, where is Exum ending up?

I have my fingers crossed so FREAKING hard for Lillard.

Lillard
Hill
DWill
Hayward
Gobert

Damn, that is a good starting five. With Burks, Joe Johnson, Lyles off the bench? Uh, yes, please.


Thats DIRT! Those guys would never click! You planning on putting G.Hill back in a corner shooting 3's like indi??

I'll take;

Hill
Hood
Hayward
Favors/JJ
Gobert

ANY DAY!!!
 
He'd actually be good. I still hate that he was a d bag.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Yes, he was. But I think he's expressed regrets. Sloan likely has forgotten he even coached a player named Deron.

Deron would need to return as the backup. He could likely play some combo guard. And no, it doesn't mean Utah has given up on Exum. It means Dante is the 3rd PG.

Jazz should pay no more than a couple of 2ndz, though. If Dallas demands a 1st, then move along.
 
I really hope this doesn't happen.

But if it does I hope Deron plays his *** off for the Jazz.

Does he accept a bench role or would he be the starter? Do we move Hill in this deal if Deron is the starter? Do we make another deal and move Hill?

I'm just not a person that gets excited about trades. I always want to see the team we have do something special. I'm a fan of the Jazz as they are constructed at any given moment.

Here a troll
There a troll
Ever where a troll troll troll
Old McTroll had a troll
E I e I Troll
 
It will be interesting to see if the Jazz make a move at the deadline. I wonder if the Jazz have started contract discussions with Hill's agent and we found that the starting point is going to be out of our range and retaining Hill is not really looking like a viable option. Maybe the Jazz already start preparing for the inevitable.
 
It will be interesting to see if the Jazz make a move at the deadline. I wonder if the Jazz have started contract discussions with Hill's agent and we found that the starting point is going to be out of our range and retaining Hill is not really looking like a viable option. Maybe the Jazz already start preparing for the inevitable.

the reining theory is that it isn't in Hill's or Hayward's best interested to commit to the jazz long-term until both players can be locked in. That scenario rules out extension talks with Hill.

In short, I don't think there's reason for your Panic Scenario.
 
I'm down with d will.... in fact I think it would be a great move.
But..... that's without knowing what we give up and I don't know his contact situation.
 
Back
Top