Kyoto
Well-Known Member
You also have to take into consideration that Dante, for the most part, is playing against the opposing teams second unit
Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
You also have to take into consideration that Dante, for the most part, is playing against the opposing teams second unit
NoooooooRubio back for the Toronto game. Eat it haters.
Total bulls###Sigh... I think Quin is doing a great job with Exum. If he keeps playing well he will be given more minutes, no need to freak out. Changing the starting PG is a big deal and in this case changes the whole look of the team.
What some claim about Exum being on a short lease is just false. Quin specializes in player development and if he deemed necessary to pull out Exum I’m sure it was for a good reason.
Due to Quinn? Last performance was due to Ricky being out. Eiundnt have happened otherwise.What you are saying doesnt make sense. Exum plays. The Jazz are developing him. Two weeks ago you mouthbreathers said Exum couldn't get better under Quin's style of teaching him, but low and behold he got better this week.
These stats are completely out of context for me. I started reading what they actually mean and went down a multi-site rabbit hole of convolution. I'm not saying they are or aren't legitimate, but we don't even know the context of what they are trying to say, or what they are counting.You also have to take into consideration that Dante, for the most part, is playing against the opposing teams second unit
Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
Total bulls###
What some claim about Exum being on a short lease is just false. Quin specializes in player development and if he deemed necessary to pull out Exum I’m sure it was for a good reason.
Kyle Lowry is also out, pretty nice break for the Jazz.Rubio back for the Toronto game. Eat it haters.
And you sound like a fanboy with pink homer glasses who only sees things through them.You sound like one of those red neck trumpsters who has to change the topic to Obama when you got nothing intelligent to say
Rubio will never have Dante's athleticism.
These stats are completely out of context for me..
Kinda disagree here, I think that power drive he had on the Knicks (Mudiay?) showed that he's not all that weak, he just has little to no idea on how to use that strength effectively. He's not strong by any sense of the word but I'm hesitant to call him weak.Dante is quick, but do not try to sell his athleticism. He is average athlete at best, weak and with beyond average vertical jumping ability.
OK lets say his is average in strength. Have you seen anybody else land on the floor after little contact during drives to the basket as much as Dante? He is pretty much knocked on the floor 9 out of 10 layup attempts. Is this weakness or lack of coordination? Coordination is part of overall athleticism as well and Dante sometimes looks like uncoordinated muppet doll.Kinda disagree here, I think that power drive he had on the Knicks (Mudiay?) showed that he's not all that weak, he just has little to no idea on how to use that strength effectively. He's not strong by any sense of the word but I'm hesitant to call him weak.
Dante's speed and length is such that he has a notable advantage over most NBA players. That's all I was saying. Kyle Korver even recently said that he hasn't seen very many players with the ability to get to the rim like Dante. It's a component of athleticism, but I agree that he isn't a great vertical athlete/leaper. Both things can be true. If you have a big enough advantage in one aspect of athleticism you can leverage that into a dominant skill. Tony Parker did that for years without being a great vertical athlete. Exum has that kind of athleticism with his speed and length combination.Dante is quick, but do not try to sell his athleticism. He is average athlete at best, weak and with beyond average vertical jumping ability.
Kyle Lowry is also out, pretty nice break for the Jazz.
Nope. I'm just saying that I am skeptical of stats that are so convoluted. I'm skeptical of lots of stats that are simple as well, or how they are applied even if I like them. When you are presented with these specific numbers in the tweet I doubt very many people understand how they are constructed. So I just think it's not very responsible to use them unless you understand them. Please elaborate on the details of exactly how they get the numbers if you have a grasp of it.So you cherry pick stats that are making sense for your cause but these which support what most of us are saying for years are out of context for you. Ok.