Navarro is the best example of success... he had his buddy in his team and came in in his athletic prime... good shooter but wasn't good defensively and ultimately returned for his role in Europe.
Teo is a better prospect I agree but is older and his defense has been awful in the euroleague... now we want him to guard the pgs in the western conference.
Add to it that he has never wanted to come to the NBA until now... when the money is much better than what he can expect in the NBA... he is mecurial and is the star of that league. He was so uninterested in coming over that no one bothered to draft him. Now he wants to come over and play backup pg for us?
It's far from an obvious home run for is and the cost is significant. If we let Hill walk and teo is the answer I'm sure Hayward would love that. If we resign hill and sign him Ingles or Favs will not be on the roster next year (already assuming Burks would be gone).
So yeah no cost or risk there at all. Also they play all of 30 games a year so NBA conditioning, pace,and physicality should not be accounted for. If this was two or three years ago I think the gamble would be interesting but now it doesn't make sense at all.
He wasnt a name when he was draft eligible.....
You know how drafting works, right?