What's new

The Jazz drafting philosophy sucks

PS... now virtually every team comes in and comments on our length.

PSS... the Lakers won a chip on ship and we're perennial contenders with 3 seven footers on the court. We are built more after their mold if you ask me.

PSS... the spurs don't shoot for the fences. Kawhi was about the safest pick in a draft, but no one thought he would be what he is now. The other philosophy , bright eyes, is to bring in a coach who can develop these talented, long, motivated, and young players.

PSSS... the one player we drafted that didn't fit the mold under DL? Trey Burke. Youngish... penile picks... and short armed. He has been a fan favorite here.

I see a plan, a technique, and growth. I for one am glad the days of quincy lewis, cj miles, Morris almond, curtis borchardt, luther... (need I continue?) And TY Corbin are long gone.

The clip on this bra is welded. Support! Bra out.

Where do some of you get your info? Burke short armed? He has a 6'5.5 wing span at slightly under 6' bare foot. That's a longer ratio than Hood, Hayward, Burks, Lyles, Neto and Exum. Burke is only behind Favors (slightly) and Gobert.
 
Its really at the heart of the problems for the Jazz, and the reason why there are no championship banners in the ESA.


The common theme the Jazz seem to use for drafting, is just try to bring in "good guys". It seems like they are willing to pass up potential for safe picks too.

This gets so old and frustrating. At what point do they say to themselves, we actually want to win, and we are gonna take some chances?

Trey Lyles is a perfect example of this. He's got all the makings of a good role player, and zero star potential. You are kidding yours if you think otherwise. So the question is, what is the point of that? Why spend a bunch of time developing a guy that you could replicate pretty easily in a trade or free agency?

I know it's hard to land a star at the 14th pick, but you still have to take swings and try. There were a bunch of players picked after Lyles that have higher upside than him.

It's not just Lyles though, this has been going on a lot. Rudy is the only draft pick in a while that they took a swing on, and that was lucky as hell that they got Denver to trade that pick for so cheap. Rudy was passed on basically twice by the Jazz when they traded for stupid Trey Burke.


It's either their philosophy sucks, or they just plain suck at picking players. Either way, it's broke. They are always going to be a step behind if they keep drafting like this.

Just saying.

My god hack!!! Don't be an effffing idiot!!! So, u know that Lyles is a bust after 30+ games, and that Booker will have the better career after 30+ games?!?!

I've said it once I've said it a thousand times!! Your an idiot!!!!
 
PS... now virtually every team comes in and comments on our length.

PSS... the Lakers won a chip on ship and we're perennial contenders with 3 seven footers on the court. We are built more after their mold if you ask me.

PSS... the spurs don't shoot for the fences. Kawhi was about the safest pick in a draft, but no one thought he would be what he is now. The other philosophy , bright eyes, is to bring in a coach who can develop these talented, long, motivated, and young players.

PSSS... the one player we drafted that didn't fit the mold under DL? Trey Burke. Youngish... penile picks... and short armed. He has been a fan favorite here.

I see a plan, a technique, and growth. I for one am glad the days of quincy lewis, cj miles, Morris almond, curtis borchardt, luther... (need I continue?) And TY Corbin are long gone.

The clip on this bra is welded. Support! Bra out.

Pssssss.

We aren't the Spurs or the Lakers, and we have no championships. I'm not sure why they have any relevance to this conversation. Their players and the choices they make have nothing to do with us. Let's not get delusional and claim their success is ours.
 
My god hack!!! Don't be an effffing idiot!!! So, u know that Lyles is a bust after 30+ games, and that Booker will have the better career after 30+ games?!?!

I've said it once I've said it a thousand times!! Your an idiot!!!!

That's all you say actually. It's predictable.

Frustrated and angry Thee is gonna call someone stupid? No way? Really? Didn't see that one coming.
 
So kirk snyder was a "good guy"?

And enes kanter was a "safe pick" rather than a pick based on potential?


Ya I wish we had more enes kanters and kirk snyders on this team

You did more of proving my point. Those were two bad draft picks. How does that defend the Jazz drafting philosophy?

Kanter was not high potential either. He was an unathletic stiff who didn't project to be a great player. That's another more on the safe side pick. And, we didn't even need another big. It was bad pick all the way around. You can't defend that one.
 
OP, thanks for a stupid thread.

Good point. It's like all the picks that haven't worked out are the risky ones.

This thread is ridiculous. Show me 10 teams with better overall drafts considering position than the Jazz since 2011.

Hack's thread starting philosophy sucks. DL, please trade him.

Then for once in your life don't have a stupid opinion


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You can call me stupid and be over the top Homer's all you want, but your opinions don't match up with reality. Where is all this success that we are supposedly having?

Have we been one of the best teams in the NBA the last decade? Or have we been a team stuck in the middle drafting towards the late lottery?

Why not think in terms of reality and not pretend land?
 
Boy hack, you really have turned into a terrible poster.
 
You can call me stupid and be over the top Homer's all you want, but your opinions don't match up with reality. Where is all this success that we are supposedly having?

Have we been one of the best teams in the NBA the last decade? Or have we been a team stuck in the middle drafting towards the late lottery?

Why not think in terms of reality and not pretend land?
Did anybody else notice that the goal posts just moved?
 
You can call me stupid and be over the top Homer's all you want, but your opinions don't match up with reality. Where is all this success that we are supposedly having?

Have we been one of the best teams in the NBA the last decade? Or have we been a team stuck in the middle drafting towards the late lottery?

Why not think in terms of reality and not pretend land?

Omg. Are u being serious?!?! This is why all my posts directed at u are the same. Fact of the matter is we are rebuilding. Rebuilding is not just a 3-5 year process unless u get lucky by getting a LBJ or Curry type players, and there's a lot of luck involved in that. Secondly... No team is perfect when it comes to the draft. Like the Jazz every team has their hits and misses. Also, it's important to recognize that just about every time they take a risk in the draft it blows up in their faces. Let's also not forget that they have had their share of success in the draft.

Just a few of our good picks...

AK47. 24th pick

Millsap second round.

Deron Williams 3rd pick. (Some experts will say he was better then cp3 during his Jazz days and his teams had more success then cp3's teams did )

Hayward, yes we missed on George, but none the less Hayward was one of the better players selected in the draft and we are lucky to have him.

Burks. 12th pick. One of the better 6th men in the league. By the way who was considered one of the more risky picks? Kanter. How'd that work for the Jazz.

Hood. 23rd pick. A lot of teams passed on him. He's actually doing more then both Hayward and George did their first two years. Not saying he will be as good or better, but u never know. Just interesting to think about

I'm probably missing some names, but damn Hack who's opinion doesn't match with reality?

Aren't u glad I didn't have the same old tiresome take of you're an idiot?
































By the way, you're still an idiot!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Is this want you people do when someone isn't like you? You try and exterminate them? Have you ever heard of Nazi's ?
Nope.
Lots of posters are nothing like me.

You are the only one that I have said has recently turned into a very bad poster though.
 
Its really at the heart of the problems for the Jazz, and the reason why there are no championship banners in the ESA.


The common theme the Jazz seem to use for drafting, is just try to bring in "good guys". It seems like they are willing to pass up potential for safe picks too.

This gets so old and frustrating. At what point do they say to themselves, we actually want to win, and we are gonna take some chances?

Fish has correctly pointed out that those guys don't fit in "don't take chances" box you have put the FO in.

From Kanter Draft Express:
Enes Kanter is one of the great mysteries of the 2011 NBA draft. He's a player who has looked incredibly dominant in small glimpses, but about whom little is known due to the unique circumstances of his arrival in the United States.

Using recently acquired game footage from his prep school days in the 2009-10 season, we've been able to learn more about his strengths and weaknesses as a prospect, which can hopefully shine some light on his ability as a player.

Prep school basketball is far from an ideal setting to evaluate Kanter's NBA prospects due to the weak competition he faced, but it's more than we previously had to work with, which was very little.

In writing this report, we looked at the following games:

-Four Stoneridge Prep games spanning from November 2009 to January 2010
-The Nike Hoop Summit on April 10, 2010
-Turkey vs. Lithuania, August 2, 2009 – Kanter vs Jonas Valanciunas at the U-18 European Championship

From DraftExpress.com https://www.draftexpress.com/#ixzz3x2ulFhCh
https://www.draftexpress.com
So they had a sample size of 6 games, 2 with college level competition. Yeah he was a very safe pick alright, no risk/reward factor at all.
Kanter has not been consistent in the way he's approached the draft process, sending mixed messages and changing strategies seemingly on a daily basis.
From DraftExpress.com https://www.draftexpress.com/#ixzz3x2vWBQtz
https://www.draftexpress.com
Cuz mixed messages=model citizen ("good guys").

From Kirk Snyder Draft Express:
Has a reputation for being somewhat of a loose cannon on and off the court.

From DraftExpress.com https://www.draftexpress.com/#ixzz3x2wEwj5q
https://www.draftexpress.com

Exum was seen as the highest if not, one of the highest risk/reward picks of his draft.

So of the 3 top 5 picks the Jazz had since the 80s, 2 of them were high bust potential picks since they were players that had hardly played at a competitive level. You are right, the conservative Jazz never take chances.
 
I have one comment on drafting Burke.

Wasn't the rumor that Corbin was the one that really, really wanted Burke and that is the main reason we drafted him? If so I'm not sure I can pin that fully on DL/KOC/whoever even if they did sign off on it. I don't know if the pick is a correct representation of drafting philosophy though.
 
Nope.
Lots of posters are nothing like me.

You are the only one that I have said has recently turned into a very bad poster though.

Not to mentioned that he dropped a Goodwin on you.

Guess that's what he does when someone isn't like him. ;)
 
I have one comment on drafting Burke.

Wasn't the rumor that Corbin was the one that really, really wanted Burke and that is the main reason we drafted him? If so I'm not sure I can pin that fully on DL/KOC/whoever even if they did sign off on it. I don't know if the pick is a correct representation of drafting philosophy though.

I think DL came out at that time and said Burke was drafted because of Corbin.

But for me that still lands on the GM. He was the man in charge and he made the choice. Corbin might of been pushing hard for Burke but welcome to being the man DL. You get the credit and the blame.
 
meh.. I'll break my silence to comment here. This is an interesting topic. I like roster composition/draft strategy talks..

The Trey Lyles(Who's got 21 starts and counting) comments from OP are biased, he holds a grudge against Trey, who's 20...Let me repeat that again - He holds a grudge against Trey, who's 20!!!! Hack's the Violet Beauregard of Jazzfanz. these type of threads and their tone, fall right in line...

200_s.gif


To say Lyles doesn't have the potential for incremental advances, year-over-year, is the assessment of a fool. Obviously, it's too early to call definitively - he's 9/23 from 3 on the season and still, he's not earned any slack from some here!?!?...

For now, he's shooting the NBA 3 better than the college 3... He's certainly far from hopeless, it's absurd to even use that word when speaking on Lyles.. Big guys take longer to develop, Trey's certainly been showing better lately. He's great for the ball-movement, I don't think he's easily replaceable at-all, certainly not at his pay grade.. That's not what I want to talk about though..

It's also worthy of note that the Jazz have had many lottery picks of late and usually players with notorious attitude issues aren't even in that range.. If they didn't take Lyles, I'd have wen't with Cameron Payne or Devin Booker, both of whom present themselves as good guys all the time, Payne's a gregarious southerner.


I do think the Jazz could use 2 or 3 rotation players with some serious attitude, and I do think they could take more fliers on risky players in the 2nd round, because of their glut of picks. Trevor Booker certainly fits this profile I'd say so does Rudy... I'd imagine that's what they were hoping for from lil Sap.. And now Chris Johnson, Raul Neto, maybe Favors or Withey... I'm not sure if that type of 'nasty' attitude is something you want to pay a premium for in the NBA draft though, over time it'd prove to be misleading -- Thats what got Tyrus Thomas drafted so high..right?

Also I'd contend you can find those type of players in the 2nd round... Draygoon Green might ring a bell..

Now as far as the draft strategy, I think what their doing and have been doing, is pretty good, dunno how you could argue otherwise.. Maybe don't always grab the BPA, who does though?!? They're certainly damn accurate, which counts for plenty, Hood and Gobert are nothing less than grade A+ picks, in the 20's..

Hayward has proven to be a great pick.. Neto looks like a damn serviceable 2nd round pick.. Trey Burke's recouping plenty of value in his pivotal 3rd season - A great sign.

Burks has been steadily improving, Dwayne Wade called him the most underrated player in the NBA the other day.. He's 36% from 3 for his career, and 38% in the last 2 seasons combined, how could anyone with reasonable standards argue he wasn't a good pick? Sure he wasn't the best possible pick, that doesn't mean he wasn't a good pick though..

It's too early to call the Exum pick. I think it will prove to be a worthy gamble though, they surely could've done much worse.

Kanter was certainly a good pick too... They didn't get a good return for him, that doesn't mean he wasn't a good pick. He's currently the 17th highest paid player in the league and 23, 2 teams that weren't the one that drafted him appraised him to be worthy of that contract -- Which certainly justifies taking him 3rd overall..

When it comes to the Jazz and the draft recently. I'd equate it to hitting in baseball.. They're hitting at least .300 which is well above league average.. Which also means they've earned the benefit of the doubt.. Now also at the same time, they've stocked up extra picks, meaning any concerns could potentially be filled in any number of ways, AKA There's little reason to be concerned with anything Jazz/Draft related...
 
Back
Top