so using this for draft order: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pB95r0G5qULSypz2od-AgOb1Kcyu2MmmK8vEPN7JxPI/edit#gid=0
i take
24 - Bell
30 - Semi
42 - Peters
55 - NWG
though this Jonathan Tjarks fella from the Ringer seems to have a fairly effed up mock. John Collins at 47, Kennard at 31, Juwan Evans at 15, Cameron Oliver at 18, Devin Robinson 19.
Fultz, I'm hoping he slips.
I don't think he said "using this mock draft"It's not a mock draft dude, it's his big board.
He called it his mockI don't think he said "using this mock draft"
He said "using this draft order"
So like he said, when using that particular draft order those are the dudes he would take.
Mock and big board can be used interchangeably imo.
They can't. Different things entirely.Mock and big board can be used interchangeably imo.
I could make a big board of my own that matches what I think each team will do therefore making it both my big board and mock draft.
No really a big deal and kind of petty to give him **** about.
He was just trying to post who he would take at each spot if the draft went down like that. That is what you should respond to rather than a single, unimportant to the general post, word in the post.
Its not petty, its the ****ing meaning of words.Mock and big board can be used interchangeably imo.
I could make a big board of my own that matches what I think each team will do therefore making it both my big board and mock draft.
No really a big deal and kind of petty to give him **** about.
He was just trying to post who he would take at each spot if the draft went down like that. That is what you should respond to rather than a single, unimportant to the general post, word in the post.
Mock and big board can be used interchangeably imo.
I could make a big board of my own that matches what I think each team will do therefore making it both my big board and mock draft.
No really a big deal and kind of petty to give him **** about.
He was just trying to post who he would take at each spot if the draft went down like that. That is what you should respond to rather than a single, unimportant to the general post, word in the post.
You can act like these two words have no meaning and you can make them what you want them to mean, but are two terms that have been created to differentiate opinion from prediction to other's actions.
He was saying who he would take at what pick if the draft went down that way.
You are making a big fuss over what word or what type of list was used. Don't do that. Just look at who he would take at what spot and talk about that..... or don't say anything sometimes. That works too.
though this Jonathan Tjarks fella from the Ringer seems to have a fairly effed up mock. John Collins at 47, Kennard at 31, Juwan Evans at 15, Cameron Oliver at 18, Devin Robinson 19.
I'm saying the word doesn't matter. People use wrong words and misspell stuff all the time. You have the douchey option of pointing it out which doesn't discuss what the person was actually talking about.You are the one changing his words.
I'm saying the word doesn't matter. People use wrong words and misspell stuff all the time. You have the douchey option of pointing it out which doesn't discuss what the person was actually talking about.
You took that route I see.
I would have argued who I would take at what spot instead ot something.
It mattered to one person. You. The person who is notorious for arguing with everyone about everything no matter how petty. Consistent at least I guess.Cool, if he misused them he can tell me and it will all be fine. I'm just trying to clear up a misunderstanding on his part, given the words he used. You are being a ****ing ******* right now.
It mattered to one person. You. The person who is notorious for arguing with everyone about everything no matter how petty. Consistent at least I guess.