Zombie
Well-Known Member
Of course not, she's not Brett Kavanaugh after all.Has she cried yet?
Of course not, she's not Brett Kavanaugh after all.Has she cried yet?
That vote was on November 2. How many lies do you intend to repeat today?
Still gotta have evidence. Can't just say, "HE EXTORTED" and get a conviction.
None. Where did I indicate a problem? I brought up what I thought was an amusing parallel between the speaker of the quote and the POTUS you are defending.
Of course not, she's not Brett Kavanaugh after all.
They voted on procedures. Not an OFFICIAL inquiry. If it was an official inquiry, then Republicans would be able to call their own witnesses.
You really can't stand me, can you?
They willWell, have articles of impeachment been written? Have they taken a vote on impeach or not?
Well then, there is no impeachment.
They haven't even voted to start the inquiry yet.
Voice recording since it was a phone call would be one thing.What would be evidence for extortion that would not rely on witness testimony? Can you give an example?
Or how about the person that you fairy tale story writers say was extorted saying he was extorted instead of saying he wasn't?
Crazy concept...
"Hey Trump extorted you"
-No he didn't
"Yes he did because a person who's father's daughter brothers Aunt said it happened."
Lol ANOTHER hypothetical.Considering what he has to lose, why would he do that?
Lol that's all you have? Lol really that's all you have...Stefanik seems desperate to try and make herself a “victim” of sexism.
Again, republicans must be winning the facts and arguments of this hearing if this is their strategy.
I'll ask again.Fascinating testimony by Yavonovitch regarding Trump's personal threat towards her, so powerful.
Yeah, like during the Clinton days. If only Trump would just get his shlong sucked by an intern instead of tweeting so much!