What's new
By:

Weather Network ****s on Breitbart climate article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
LogGrad98 said:
Is this the post you wanted me to reply to? Standard ad hominem and the normal leftist tactic of ignoring/denigrating sources rather than considering the facts and sources presented behind the opinions? And you wonder why I don't respond to this kind of drivel? Hilarious. Back on ignore.
Click to expand...

It wasn't that one

*still waiting*
 
DutchJazzer said:
this graph does not take into effetc changing orbit of earth. for example.

all these models lack info.

the climate is a complex thing, and we think science is settled based on models we made of this complex system.

yet most man made climate change models so far have failed, but we dont seem to call out the people out on it
Click to expand...

More from one of the worlds most prestigious intellectual institutions Stanford on how bad models are manipulating global warming hysteria.

https://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/DamonLaut2004.pdf

Lol the liberals were trying to claim sunspot inactivity was created by man made CO2 cause they have a model.
 
Stoked said:
Massive cuts to carbon emissions all at once would cripple the coal industry and industrial factories.

Yes we need to get off coal, yes we need to improve air quality, but you work your way into it. It doesn't just happen over night.

I have long advocated increasing research into alt energy sources and getting off oil. For example requiring all new semis to run off CNG and a scale of how long old rigs should run. Making hydrogen fuel cells a working tech for personal automobiles.

Push for improvements and cleaner industry but do it at a manageable pace. That's what I am saying. There is a balance.

For the record: I am not even a climate change denier. I think it clearly happens. I question how much of it is our fault and I doubt the impending disaster scenarios pitched in some publications but it clearly is happening. It is an issue.
Click to expand...

Industries come and go so why wait? Coal is a main cause of air pollution. Procrastination isn't the way to go innovation along with conservation should be the path. Any progress that has been made will be wiped out in this next Administration simply so a few rich people can make more money while they pollute our environment even more. As humans it is our moral obligation to take care of the one planet that we know can provide us a place to live and to exist. I am not an expert on this subject and don't really care about the data but it seems like common sense would be enough to get people to take immediate action. Pouring chemicals into our underground waters and sending more CO2 into our air should be obvious to anyone that it isn't healthy for the planet and all living things.
 
To be clear about something, CO2 in and of itself is not "pollution". It is necessary for plant life, and be extension animal life. Periods in earth's past with the highest CO2 levels and highest temperatures coincided with the greatest number and variety of living organisms in every sphere. See the panic mongering gets people with "common sense" to ignore certain well established truths top further the agenda. CO2 in the atmosphere is decidedly NOT a health risk.
 
Yeah, to say more CO2 in our atmosphere is not healthy for the planet or ALL living things is flat out wrong.

More CO2 in our atmosphere is disruptive to the established zones inhabited by humans vs animals, to the areas currently designated for agriculture, for highly populated coastal areas, for established sources of fresh water.

Global warming is not the destruction of earth, is it the disruption of our current establishment.
 
LogGrad98 said:
To be clear about something, CO2 in and of itself is not "pollution". It is necessary for plant life, and be extension animal life. Periods in earth's past with the highest CO2 levels and highest temperatures coincided with the greatest number and variety of living organisms in every sphere. See the panic mongering gets people with "common sense" to ignore certain well established truths top further the agenda. CO2 in the atmosphere is decidedly NOT a health risk.
Click to expand...

Nobody said C02 was a health risk.......

But the particles and smog released with fossil fuel burning are extremely harmful to our health.
 
Beantown said:
Nobody said C02 was a health risk.......

But the particles and smog released with fossil fuel burning are extremely harmful to our health.
Click to expand...

Yes, someone did say CO2 was a health risk.
 
Hey Beanie, so I've had some energy efficient work done on my home. Not solar panels or anything...anyway, I wanted to see if my energy usage is good. On my last gas bill, I used 63 therms. According to my gas company, this is great as my efficient neighbors use about 92 therms and all neighbors average about 131 therms. Any idea if this is good for a 2,650 square foot home?
 
LogGrad98 said:
Answers my previous question. Conservative news source = ignore and ridicule. Liberal news source = gospel truth.
Click to expand...

"Conservative news source" is putting it very lightly bro.

Your article was started from a direct adviser to Mr. Oil man himself.....Dick Cheney.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Answers my previous question. Conservative news source = ignore and ridicule. Liberal news source = gospel truth.
Click to expand...

how did the world come to this! in my view it all started when cnn swung left. and then reached the critical mass when tucker Carlson was fired from msnbc for being "right-wing".

now it cant recover
 
Also [MENTION=499]LogGrad98[/MENTION]:

Even if renewables had higher incentives....wouldn't that be a good thing?

Why are you against getting away from energy production that causes cancer and child asthma? Are you that big of a douche?
 
Beantown said:
Also [MENTION=499]LogGrad98[/MENTION]:

Even if renewables had higher incentives....wouldn't that be a good thing?

Why are you against getting away from energy production that causes cancer and child asthma? Are you that big of a douche?
Click to expand...

lol any conservative view is based on that right
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top