What's new
By:

Weather Network ****s on Breitbart climate article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
The fight against harmful pollution and climate change is the same fight. The sooner everyone comes to realize this the better off we will be.
 
Beantown said:
The fight against harmful pollution and climate change is the same fight. The sooner everyone comes to realize this the better off we will be.
Click to expand...


no IT IS NOT!
define harmfull. co2 is not harmfull!


there is way more harmful environmental pollution for example the lithium (and other such materials) mines that are used to make batteries to phones and devices we throw away every 12-24 months.


I don't accept your liberal "truth" about co2 being harmful. more actual science is needed to proof it. model based science is not settled science, it is not reliable. it is error prone the more complex the field of study is!


so yeah untill then i will roal coal. all hail co2. c02 is essential in the formation of all kinds of live :D
 
my ford bronco which is a guzzoline guzzler is friendlier to the environment than these liberals who get a new electric car every few years!
 
DutchJazzer said:
no IT IS NOT!
define harmfull. co2 is not harmfull!


there is way more harmful environmental pollution for example the lithium (and other such materials) mines that are used to make batteries to phones and devices we throw away every 12-24 months.


I don't accept your liberal "truth" about co2 being harmful. more actual science is needed to proof it. model based science is not settled science, it is not reliable. it is error prone the more complex the field of study is!


so yeah untill then i will roal coal. all hail co2. c02 is essential in the formation of all kinds of live :D
Click to expand...

C02 in itself is not harmful. But you're living a lie if you think dumping huge amounts of C02 doesn't affect the earths atmosphere.

I guess I will just have to believe NASA and the science community over you.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
 
Beantown said:
C02 in itself is not harmful. But you're living a lie if you think dumping huge amounts of C02 doesn't affect the earths atmosphere.

I guess I will just have to believe NASA and the science community over you.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Click to expand...

sorry bro i started to read that, and the first thing they state is already a LIE

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.
Click to expand...

sorry but if their first statement/sentence is an outright lie i just stop reading(kinda like how obummer lied in his speech about women earning less then men). how can i read further if they don't respect a simple truth!
 
Beantown said:
Also [MENTION=499]LogGrad98[/MENTION]:

Even if renewables had higher incentives....wouldn't that be a good thing?

Why are you against getting away from energy production that causes cancer and child asthma? Are you that big of a douche?
Click to expand...

Please post the quotes where I said any of that ****. Pretty Standard liberal rhetoric. If someone disagrees with any part of the argument you can accuse them of believing ANYTHING you want. That's easier than debating the actual facts presented when you can put words in other people's mouths.
 
Beantown said:
NASA > PragerU
Click to expand...

yeah keep watching nasa website now that re-pubs are in power again. watch how it changes.
it is a government agency! don't be naive it is just as trust worthy as a right wing institution.

government agencies are used for political gain. climate change has become a political tool of mass religion.


the thing about that is when a new party/ideology is in power. the stuff will change!
 
Beantown said:
"Conservative news source" is putting it very lightly bro.

Your article was started from a direct adviser to Mr. Oil man himself.....Dick Cheney.
Click to expand...

I get the feeling if fox news ran an article stating that 2X2=4 you would refuse to consider it and accuse anyone who believes that of wanting to kill babies with car exhaust.
 
LogGrad98 said:
I get the feeling if fox news ran an article stating that 2X2=4 you would refuse to consider it and accuse anyone who believes that of wanting to kill babies with car exhaust.
Click to expand...

what kinda car exhaust? a Tesla car exhaust or a ford bronco?

i would totally try to abort my first born son after a few weeks when i get sick of his crying with a Tesla exhaust
 
DutchJazzer said:
yeah keep watching nasa website now that re-pubs are in power again. watch how it changes.
it is a government agency! don't be naive it is just as trust worthy as a right wing institution.

government agencies are used for political gain. climate change has become a political tool of mass religion.


the thing about that is when a new party/ideology is in power. the stuff will change!
Click to expand...

If that we're true than Obama would't be fracking the **** out of our country for gas.

You really need to do your homework.
 
Beantown said:
If that we're true than Obama would't be fracking the **** out of our country for gas.

You really need to do your homework.
Click to expand...




actually oil extraction on federal land is down, because obummer tried to shut it down he could not because of contractual obligations so he did the next best thing "reduce it at any cost possible."
but on private and land oil extraction is way up. thanks to local republican governors allowing it. which caused the price to drop
yet that shameless socialist obummer took credit for the low oil price! and before that they ridiculed Sarah Pailins "drill baby drill" campaign slogan


under obummer oil and natural gas extraction was down more than 40% on federal land. he had total control over that.

now the parts he had no control over whatsoever(unless he declared martial law) oil drilling is up by 89% on state and private land


so yeah obummer is not fracking the frack out of the country's for gas.


btw i did my home work

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z96ZiaQbwqw


Palin_DrillBabyDrill.PNG
 
but yeah i know you like to believe obama did it!


because he said so himself in a speech!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxcUofFiES8
OBAMA never lies right!
 
the more gas being extracted from earth is not because of OBAMA it is IN SPITE of him!


so make no mistake. Even these increase in private sector oil extraction were realized in spite of the Obama administration’s best efforts.

using the unconstitutional EPA to hinder some private/state oil and gass extraction
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top