Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
Any morals, but for the sake of this discussion let's make it simple. When we come upon an animal there is a handy way to make a determination if it's a male or a female. This method is not to ask it how it gender identifies. It is to actually look at its genitals and make the determination for ourselves. But now we are being told that where humans are concerned this is no longer a simple matter. It doesn't matter whether a human has a penis dangling between their legs. What matters is what sort of plumbing they wish they had.
But how are we supposed to know what type of plumbing they wish they had? What we do know is that animals with penises tend to be more aggressive in their use than animals who have vaginas are in their use. There are some very good evolutionary reasons for this. Do you need me to go into detail?
So, because we have plenty of data that many animals (including human animals) who happen to have penises (no matter how they gender identify) are interested in looking for places to insert them or things to rub them against, I would prefer that my government not mandate that they be welcomed into the girls showers.
Now? Gender is a human societal thing. Been around a long time. I studied the concept of gender in college 15+ years ago, and it's only now we're told differently because it's new to you?
Would it shock you to learn that other human societies have had genders NOT what Western culture would define as man and woman? Look up the word "berdache" for an idea.