What's new

If Trump dodges debates...

Explain please

At the DNC a Mr. Khan, father of a deceased soldier, spoke and blasted the RNC candidate. In retaliation he tweeted that Mrs. Khan didn't speak due to her religion as they are muslim. Implying that in Muslim eyes she is less.

Mr. Khan's son died in the middle east actively protecting his platoon. I wonder if vet groups will be pissed about this.
 
At the DNC a Mr. Khan, father of a deceased soldier, spoke and blasted the RNC candidate. In retaliation he tweeted that Mrs. Khan didn't speak due to her religion as they are muslim. Implying that in Muslim eyes she is less.

Mr. Khan's son died in the middle east actively protecting his platoon. I wonder if vet groups will be pissed about this.
Trump stuck his foot in his mouth big time on this one. His statements on the subject have been insensitive, offensive and disgusting. He just can't get out of his own way. I honestly believed there could not be a worse choice for president than Hillary, but Trump seems like he's determined to prove me wrong.
 
Trump stuck his foot in his mouth big time on this one. His statements on the subject have been insensitive, offensive and disgusting. He just can't get out of his own way. I honestly believed there could not be a worse choice for president than Hillary, but Trump seems like he's determined to prove me wrong.

He does have a big mouth alright...
 
He does have a big mouth alright...
Doesn't it seem like at this point he would have some advisors to help him think these sorts of statements through? There are all sorts of people who I'm sure want to give him their advise, but he's probably unwilling to listen.

He should have said something like, "I'm so thankful for your son's service and shattered by your loss. I couldn't imagine losing my son." If he just can't leave it without getting a dig in he could add, "It saddens me that Hillary voted for that war."
 
Here's an example of someone handling a very similar situation to the one Mr Trump has found himself in with a lot more dignity and grace.

Sent from my VS987 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
Here's an example of someone handling a very similar situation to the one Mr Trump has found himself in with a lot more dignity and grace.

Sent from my VS987 using JazzFanz mobile app

It doesn't take that his actions were what caused the situation.

How about not having started an illegal war in the 1st place?
 
You must have posted your links elsewhere. I don't see them here. Again an "unbiased statistically analysis"(lol) does not exist. You said it does you provide it.

I posted it once in this thread, you can search the thread or google it again, I dont really care enough to track it down again. Or just look at every/any fact checking organization that deals with this and they have all come to the same conclusion this election year with a slight variation. Some of them might lean slightly right some might lean slightly left but they all the independent ones give the same result. That is what I drew my conclusion from. If you care enough research it yourself and if you find something different I would love to see it.
 
It doesn't take that his actions were what caused the situation.

How about not having started an illegal war in the 1st place?
That's true, and to be clear I am by no means a fan of Mr Bush.

The point was just to show there is another way to respond to criticism.

The way Trump has handled this makes George Bush appear intelligent and well spoken in comparison. That's just ridiculous.

Sent from my VS987 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
So what you're saying is that you only watch this sort of info if it's presented in a humorous way with a left-wing bias? Unfortunately, I think a lot of people get much of their political info in the same way.

This video is not very funny or slanted so you probably won't want to watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sskt9yehT5g


This is your "not slanted" video? You realize this clearly creates the impression that Clinton was found guilty of wrong-doing when in fact she wasn't even formally charged with anything.

You want to say that this catches Clinton changing her story? Fine. But it's only unbiased through the minds of people who have a pre-conceived notion of her guilt.

You people have been mind ****ed for so long it doesn't even register anymore - it's like throwing a hot dog down a hallway.
 
I posted it once in this thread, you can search the thread or google it again, I dont really care enough to track it down again. Or just look at every/any fact checking organization that deals with this and they have all come to the same conclusion this election year with a slight variation. Some of them might lean slightly right some might lean slightly left but they all the independent ones give the same result. That is what I drew my conclusion from. If you care enough research it yourself and if you find something different I would love to see it.

I went through the thread but did not see it.

The truth is you made a claim that is ridiculous, that you could quantify a persons honesty. Politifact does not even make that claim. If you don't want to back up a ridiculous claim. Don't make it.
 
Back
Top