It's only obvious to you. The Jazz made a fiscally responsible decision. This isn't a video game, it's an actual business that needs to be profitable. The Jazz have the 5th highest payroll in one of the league's smallest markets. You can argue the money is not well spent but it's hard to argue the Millers were not willing to spend. To say they are cheap is just idiotic.
Wes Mathews or Gordon Hayward
- Thread starter Mission Accomplished
- Start date
It's only obvious to you. The Jazz made a fiscally responsible decision. This isn't a video game, it's an actual business that needs to be profitable. The Jazz have the 5th highest payroll in one of the league's smallest markets. You can argue the money is not well spent but it's hard to argue the Millers were not willing to spend. To say they are cheap is just idiotic.
Wes is sucking in playoffs
He also has a weak mid range game.
Like I said, the choice was match Wes or sign an oldie, post-injury but cheaper Bell. Sure, Wes isn't perfect but he has a lot of good qualities we all know, which makes him so much better than Bell and that's what matters. Old news but still can't stand all the revisionist history.
The dollars don't work, but otherwise yes I would.
Did you watch any of the games at the end of the season? Remember Wes has at least 3 years on Hayward.
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
Before Hayward went off at the end of the season, I said a while back that Hayward would become a 20 point a night scorer. Put me down for Hayward
Mission Accomplished
Well-Known Member
Wes did a good job last year for us during the playoffs. Could Gordon Hayward be a 20 point a night scorer or did it have more to do with the teams we were playing, his minutes, and his touches. I seem to remember that Wes didn't really need to dominate the ball last year for us to get his points.
I'm guessing this must be intentional comedy.