I don’t think that was the question.We'll see who gets the bigger contract this offseason, it won't be favors.
I don’t think that was the question.We'll see who gets the bigger contract this offseason, it won't be favors.
Randle is from Dallas and they will have the cap space to give him a nice deal.
All depends on what Favors does should we make the postseason. Last year, Gobert had some issues but they rarely ever played together. If they cant play together or are ineffective this year, I don't want to pay Favors a probable $12+ this summer. And honestly, I like Randle's upside much more than Favors, but he is a terrible fit too.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Please tell me you're kidding. Jesus Christ.
Would rep if I could for the SF comment. That was pretty damn funny back in the day.Neither is any better or worse than the other, just depends on what you want. Favors is a center on the next team he goes to. Randle gives you some playmaking at PF with the ability to abuse smaller players. Neither will ever have a 3 point shot. Also One Love lied to us all and promised Randle would be a SF...don't think we forgot.
Not every poster is a native English speaker. Be kind.
On the original topic, Favors, adn it's not even close.
Favors for 4 years $12 per? Screw that until we see him succeed next to Gobert come playoff time.
The homerism on Favors is legendarily strong.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
That is not a Jae Crowder-like tradeable contract.Favors for 4 years $12 per is a hill that I'm willing to die on. That is a Jae Crowder like tradeable contract, even if you figure he doesn't fit sometime in the future.