No, I see how ridiculous it is. It's kind of sad, too. The people behind this completely misunderstood human thinking, reactions, and emotional attachments. What actually happened is that racists, looking for a covert signal, latched onto this gesture, and ran with it. That took the joke and made it into a reality.
See, here's an example of someone who doesn't know the difference between "wrong" and "offensive". You can't expect that people like this will understand that attaching a new, ugly meaning to an old symbol is easy, proves nothing, and leaves only destruction behind it.
The left won't get triggered until racists start eating that type of food to show their social power. When it gets featured in white power songs, rallies, and pictures as a symbol of white power, the lefties will distance themselves from that symbol unless it has some greater social relevance.
It's going nowhere, because the meaning of symbols changes all the time, and can mean different things in different places. A cross means something different when in a church, a graveyard, or in the ground of a black family when placed there by neighbors. The last usage hasn't stopped lefties from using crosses in the first two ways because the of social significance of the first two uses. The OK symbol had no similar cultural momentum behind it.
As I said, symbols have different meanings at different times, and changing the meaning of a symbol can be fairly easy.