Dali
Well-Known Member
I said he had a good game tonight... didn’t say he’s been good or that it wasn’t an outlier... individual plus minus in one game is a garbage way to evaluate a player. DM was -3 are we saying “yeah he scores 20 but he gives up more than he scores”.
I get it... some of y’all hate the guys you hate and can’t recognize when they play well.
Even still HH, is this what we would call a good game by Niang? He was all kinds of horrific on defense. As much as I am thankful for his 100 percent three point shooting, his defense cemented his negative result. Why are you choosing to disregard his defensive effort today?
Does it only take some solid offense to think a player played well? If so, then you've set a precedent HH. Let it then be that if Dante for example, hits a few shots but is a complete negative on defense, we can still say he had a good game.
You know what the fact is mate? If this was Dante, I would be furious with his defensive output, and would still recognize he had a bad game overall.