Still waiting for you to address that Stormy literally admitted none of this happened.
They don't violate the Sixth Amendment. All gag orders violate the First Amendment, but the Sixth Amendment allows for some violation of the First Amendment in the name of providing a fair trail. So long as the gag order is tailored to providing a fair trial then a reviewing judge will uphold the First Amendment violating gag order on Sixth Amendment grounds. If it extends beyond those bounds then it can be struck down. The gag order on Trump is extended out to cover people that have no bearing on the outcome of the trial, and as such would not be justified by the Sixth Amendment.
If only Trump could talk about this and talk about how the judge is a Biden donor and his daughter literally works for Biden. And I directly quote...
Exactly... I would like to know how the Judges daughter who all but works for the Biden administration is protected from scrutiny. Why can't Trump no point out that she has worked for Kamala and Biden? Why can't Trump not expose that the Judge is an ardent Biden supporter? What rule exactly is being broken here?
I like how you call yourself a right leaning conservative but only post CNN and left leaning articles lol.CNN Reporter Says Trump Got ‘A Little Physical’ Prompting His Attorney In Court
Paula Reid said the former president was actively prodding his lawyer to object.www.yahoo.com
“Today, he’s gotten a little physical with Susan Necheles, one of his lawyers, sort of hitting her on the arm, prompting her to object,” Reid said
Reid said Trump had been “really scrutinizing” his defense lawyers, engaging in “spirited conversations with all three of them.”
She said, “He clearly has a lot of ideas about exactly how this defense should be carried out.”
Trump was reportedly shaking his head and audibly cursing during Daniels’ testimony, prompting Judge Juan Merchan to warn Trump’s lead attorney, Todd Blanche, to speak to his client.
“I understand that your client is upset at this point,” Merchan told Blanche, according to transcripts obtained by The Washington Post. He said the behavior needed to stop because “it has the potential to intimidate the witness, and the jury can see that.”
Some legal experts have suggested that Trump appears to be damaging his defense by pushing his attorneys to use language and strategies that don’t hold up in court.
Trump knows more about being a lawyer than anyone
Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
These are sitting senators who are saying that they’ll only accept election results when their team wins.Tim Scott’s Election Results Answer Shows Exactly Where GOP Is Headed
Every contender for Donald Trump’s vice president is saying the same thing: Democracy doesn’t matter.
Senator Tim Scott over the weekend exposed exactly where the Republican Party is headed, when he refused to answer a question on whether he would accept the 2024 election results.
MSNBC’s Kristen Welker on Sunday asked the South Carolina Republican point-blank if he would accept the 2024 election results, “no matter who wins.”
Scott replied, “At the end of the day, the forty-seventh president of the United States will be President Donald Trump.” When pressed further, he said, “That is my statement.”
Trump of course has long refused to say whether he’d accept election results where he lost, even in 2016, when he often complained of a “rigged election” on the campaign trail. Just weeks before November’s election, he claimed he’d accept the results only “if I win.”
In 2020, Americans saw what Trump meant with those words. He refused to concede his loss to Joe Biden, fighting the results with fake elector schemes from his lawyers and even arguably inciting an insurrection at the Capitol building on the day the country’s election results were certified. His refusal to acknowledge his loss would become the Big Lie: that the 2020 election win was stolen from him, the legitimate winner. As Tim Scott’s words demonstrate, many of his faithful supporters still believe it in earnest.
Scott’s answer sounds much like those of other contenders for Trump’s V.P. In the past, J.D. Vance and Elise Stefanik, for example, both admitted they would not have certified the 2020 election results if they were in Vice President Mike Pence’s shoes on January 6.
Scott went on in the interview to assert that the Democratic Party is supporting “abortion up until the day of birth,” only to get pushback from Welker, who noted that no Democrats have said that.
Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
No there's not. Great lie.
Is it so dangerous for democracy? Or is it only dangerous for democracy when your team wins?
When even fishes favorite news channel is calling you out. That's bad. Really bad. I can hear your blood boiling from here bruh. Hey @fishonjazz ... Pretty bad when the star witness admits there was hush money and Stormy admits she fantasizes about Trump in jail... That's bad. Sounds like you guys.
