I have thought that before. I think I still kind of do. The highs can show you what a player is capable of if developed to their maximum potential. Or in other words the highs can give you a glimpse of their ceiling.Traore has some massive games….his playoff game last year made me think he could be in the mix for top 3 before the season. But he also has so many stinkers and he’s continued to be inconsistent.
I remember when people were hyping JHS because he had some massive games. There was this idea that a player’s peak meant more. Obviously didn’t work out for JHS, but is there anyone that still subscribes to that theory?
All information is important though, so I'm not sure I would say highs mean more.