Larsen confirmed the Jazz are sending a pick. Somehow.Who gets the second round pick
There's conflicting info here
Then just don’t do the trade. If Sexton was about to go nuclear on the Jazz, then buy-him out. This **** just makes no sense.Jazz have been trying to trade Sexton for 2 full years. I trust they know what trades were out there for him and took back the least damaging one.
I just cannot believe that this was Sexton's value. Go to any forum, any msg board, any reddit. This trade is viewed in similar terms as the Pelicans draft day trade. Now, of course it's not of the same potential consequence, but it's being viewed almost unanimously as a horrible deal for the Jazz and great get for the Hornets.Your takes have been awful on this imo. It's a move that had to be done
But not as bad as when we gave up a potential first to throw away Favors.Larsen confirmed the Jazz are sending a pick. Somehow.
Yeah. Cuz it is. It makes absolutely zero sense.I just cannot believe that this was Sexton's value. Go to any forum, any msg board, any reddit. This trade is viewed in similar terms as the Pelicans draft day trade. Now, of course it's not of the same potential consequence, but it's being viewed almost unanimously as a horrible deal for the Jazz and great get for the Hornets.
I tried telling you guys that all he meant was that they wouldn’t sit good players to lose games. Losing with a bad roster technically isn’t tanking. But instead yall decided he meant they would try to be good, which anybody with any sense would be able to tell wasn’t feasible.That must be the goal. I knew AA was full of crap when he said we wouldn't tank again lol.
2031.It’s a good second too. The better of the Jazz/Clippers in 2030.
They don't want salary on the books that far out. Is that correct? Who knows.Why didn’t we just send Sexton and two or three 2nds to the Celtics for Jrue?
Jazz don't vet players on huge contracts that have to startThey don't want salary on the books that far out. Is that correct? Who knows.