What's new

Chess Match Thread

1. e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10.Qd2, Nh7

thanks for the tip Enes. Siro is right, but I've been in this predicament before. This is where it gets crazy and either ends quickly or ?

I think my inexpert handling with the image links caused my problems with it but I'm still not willing to touch that link. Would you please just keep the image up to date with your moves?

It does put me back on familiar ground to see it from my perspective. I am not using a chess board here to follow the game or plan my moves, I am however trying to challenge my brain to work with what shows in here. I'll learn to to do it pretty quick.

As a device for knowing when a move has been made, let's do the "like" button (even if we are making some huge blunder) to help each other find the move and respond, OK?

No problem, babe. Anything I can to help you.

As for the like device, I suppose you don't use the quote notification function. You can also have a notification when I/someone quoted you. But anyway, I will both quote you and like your post when I make my move.

1. e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10. Qd2 Nh7
11. d5

3c8z9fmgjl6o0.png
 
No problem, babe. Anything I can to help you.

As for the like device, I suppose you don't use the quote notification function. You can also have a notification when I/someone quoted you. But anyway, I will both quote you and like your post when I make my move.
1.e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10. Qd2 Nh7
11.d5, e5
]
 
28. . . resigns

I don't know what I was thinking. Now I lose the e-pawn and the game. I had to play hxg6. Still, the position was very difficult to defend. Very nice game, Siro. Thanks for playing.
Good Lord. Sir, I respect your game and decision but that's a very very early resign. I can assure you as a "once competitor chess player" that you can win many games coming from behind in the end games. I know I had many of those games. Especially after trading Queens and when you are rook to rook or rooks to rooks, it's so easy to make mistakes in the end games so even the very experienced players can make them. You just proved that actually with a simple mistake. But you didn't give any chance to yourself, at all.

But like I said, I respect your game. Maybe you just didn't have the time or will.
 
Good Lord. Sir, I respect your game and decision but that's a very very early resign. I can assure you as a "once competitor chess player" that you can win many games coming from behind in the end games. I know I had many of those games. Especially after trading Queens and when you are rook to rook or rooks to rooks, it's so easy to make mistakes in the end games so even the very experienced players can make them. You just proved that actually with a simple mistake. But you didn't give any chance to yourself, at all.

But like I said, I respect your game. Maybe you just didn't have the time or will.

Some people get used to being in the game with the advantage, and would rather not play from behind.

I don't mind making that effort, and give myself respect for being able to pose a challenge to the top dogs, like Siro. I would have resigned after my first blunder in that game if I didn't mind seeing what I could do under those circumstances, against a better player like Siro.

Well, Enes, I'll have to get back to our game on Friday night.
 
No problem, babe. Anything I can to help you.

As for the like device, I suppose you don't use the quote notification function. You can also have a notification when I/someone quoted you. But anyway, I will both quote you and like your post when I make my move.

1.e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10. Qd2 Nh7
11.d5, e5

1. e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10. Qd2 Nh7
11. d5 e5
12. dxc6

49wrfpd3t9gk0.png
 
Some people get used to being in the game with the advantage, and would rather not play from behind.

I don't mind making that effort, and give myself respect for being able to pose a challenge to the top dogs, like Siro. I would have resigned after my first blunder in that game if I didn't mind seeing what I could do under those circumstances, against a better player like Siro.

Well, Enes, I'll have to get back to our game on Friday night.
Alright, see you later then.
 
Good Lord. Sir, I respect your game and decision but that's a very very early resign. I can assure you as a "once competitor chess player" that you can win many games coming from behind in the end games. I know I had many of those games. Especially after trading Queens and when you are rook to rook or rooks to rooks, it's so easy to make mistakes in the end games so even the very experienced players can make them. You just proved that actually with a simple mistake. But you didn't give any chance to yourself, at all.

But like I said, I respect your game. Maybe you just didn't have the time or will.

Both Log and Jonah resigned from games that were perfectly salvageable. Sure it would have difficult for them to win, but I personally would never resign unless defeat is certain. :p

Regardless, I remain undefeated. Will One Brow beat me? Will I go down as the best chess player in JF history? Will I be honored with a statue next to Malone and Stockton's? Only time will tell.
 
Both Log and Jonah resigned from games that were perfectly salvageable. Sure it would have difficult for them to win, but I personally would never resign unless defeat is certain. :p

Regardless, I remain undefeated. Will One Brow beat me? Will I go down as the best chess player in JF history? Will I be honored with a statue next to Malone and Stockton's? Only time will tell.
Yep. Though as far as I remember Log was down a piece and many pro-players resign when they are down a piece and have no positional advantage. I think it depends on the importance of the game. Like, if you were in a tournament where you prefer resting for the next game you could withdraw at that point. But if you need points, you would go till the end and hope for mistakes, blunders etc.

But, Jonah's game honestly was way too early to resign. End games with rooks are extremely open to everything and being one pawn down definitely should not discourage the player. Especially if your pawn structure isn't damaged too much.


By the way, Enes, you can copy/paste the link above the one you're doing (the one with tags). That way it becomes clickab...aybe it was a momentarily bug of the website.
 
Good Lord. Sir, I respect your game and decision but that's a very very early resign. I can assure you as a "once competitor chess player" that you can win many games coming from behind in the end games. I know I had many of those games. Especially after trading Queens and when you are rook to rook or rooks to rooks, it's so easy to make mistakes in the end games so even the very experienced players can make them. You just proved that actually with a simple mistake. But you didn't give any chance to yourself, at all.

But like I said, I respect your game. Maybe you just didn't have the time or will.

I hear what you're saying and you make good points. It's true that I was kicking myself for my blunder and lost some fighting spirit. But I did try to make an objective decision: we were about to trade down to a rook and pawns ending and those can go for thirty or forty moves without resolution, I thought I'm down a pawn, playing very rusty, haven't played a serious game or a rated player in years, so the best I can reasonably hope for is a draw after many more hours of play. I thought the sporting thing to do was resign and play again another day. My attitude was I just want to sharpen my play, relearn a few openings so I'm not in the dark after five moves, and really just have some fun playing more games because the players here are a good group, but if people want to play a more fighting style of chess I can do that too. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ema
I was down 2 pawns and at a positional disadvantage, and it would likely have been a long drawn out end game. Since siro had made very few blatant mistakes it was reasonable to assume the same level of play in the end game, and frankly I want interested in a long pawn end game that I likely wouldn't win anyway. And I was kind of thinking along the same lines as jonah.
 
I hear what you're saying and you make good points. It's true that I was kicking myself for my blunder and lost some fighting spirit. But I did try to make an objective decision: we were about to trade down to a rook and pawns ending and those can go for thirty or forty moves without resolution, I thought I'm down a pawn, playing very rusty, haven't played a serious game or a rated player in years, so the best I can reasonably hope for is a draw after many more hours of play. I thought the sporting thing to do was resign and play again another day. My attitude was I just want to sharpen my play, relearn a few openings so I'm not in the dark after five moves, and really just have some fun playing more games because the players here are a good group, but if people want to play a more fighting style of chess I can do that too. :)
Fair enough. I can understand how you feel. I haven't played any chess too for years now and I also feel very rusty so I'm reluctant to play. I just finished a match of 7 games(5 min blitz) against a guy rated 1850 on a site and it ended 5 to 2. At my peak, I used to compete with those 1800-1900 rated players much better and I was about to improve my rating to their levels.

I was down 2 pawns and at a positional disadvantage, and it would likely have been a long drawn out end game. Since siro had made very few blatant mistakes it was reasonable to assume the same level of play in the end game, and frankly I want interested in a long pawn end game that I likely wouldn't win anyway. And I was kind of thinking along the same lines as jonah.
Hmm, I revisited your game. You are right, you weren't down a piece, you were behind 2 pawns but Siro had huge positional advantage. His extra pawns were inside of the wings and his pawn structure was perfect. One of the wings was going to reach to the final rank inevitably. You got to be a complete beginner to ruin that advantage. So in your case, I think it was the right thing to resign.
 


1. Nf3 e6
2. g3 Nc6
3. Bg2 Be7
4. d4 f5
5. b3 Nf6
6. Bb2
 
One Brow vs. Siro



1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Bb4
5. e3 Nc6
6. Nf3 0-0
7. Bd3 Be7
8. 0-0 b6
9. Qc2 dxc4
10. Bxc4 Nb4
11. Qb3 Bb7
12. Bxf6 gxf6
13. a3
 


1. Nf3 e6
2. g3 Nc6
3. Bg2 Be7
4. d4 f5
5. b3 Nf6
6. Bb2 0-0
7. c4
 


1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Bb4
5. e3 Nc6
6. Nf3 0-0
7. Bd3 Be7
8. 0-0 b6
9. Qc2 dxc4
10. Bxc4 Nb4
11. Qb3 Bb7
12. Bxf6 gxf6
13. a3 Nd5
 
ONe Brow vx. Siro



1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Bb4
5. e3 Nc6
6. Nf3 0-0
7. Bd3 Be7
8. 0-0 b6
9. Qc2 dxc4
10. Bxc4 Nb4
11. Qb3 Bb7
12. Bxf6 gxf6
13. a3 Nd5
14. Nxd5
 


1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Bb4
5. e3 Nc6
6. Nf3 0-0
7. Bd3 Be7
8. 0-0 b6
9. Qc2 dxc4
10. Bxc4 Nb4
11. Qb3 Bb7
12. Bxf6 gxf6
13. a3 Nd5
14. Nxd5 Bxd5
 
Back
Top