2017 Annual JazzFanz Current Players NBA Draft

[RandyForRubio]

[MENTION=3073]JustTheTip[/MENTION] are you using same lineups?

(I am)

Idk yet. I'll loook at yours and textvyou

 

[RandyForRubio]

Oh ****

I'm against the other most annoying person everyone likes to vote against.

People are gonna be real conflicted.

 

[RandyForRubio]

It's bs that WC's ****ty *** team gets 1st seed.

 

[Elizah Huge]

It's bs that WC's ****ty *** team gets 1st seed.

The two best teams got the 1st and 2nd seed. I think the system works pretty well.

 

[RandyForRubio]

The two best teams got the 1st and 2nd seed. I think the system works pretty well.

Your team isn't one of the two best teams tho. You just had a favorable matchup.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Yeah how much a team won by does not mean you are a better team. Addy could have the best team he just had a tough matchup and tied.

 

[elan_prodigy]

Your team isn't one of the two best teams tho. You just had a favorable matchup.

Fancy that.

 

[elan_prodigy]

Id prefer the 1-16 approach from the draw than having the commish decide the matchups.

 

[Siro]

I like the way WC did this. Some sort of seeding, no matter how inaccurate, is better than random draw, for a progressively more competitive tourney.

 

[addictionary]

Yeah how much a team won by does not mean you are a better team. Addy could have the best team he just had a tough matchup and tied.

Which means that seeding and standings does not affect the outcomes of the latter rounds. If you have a better team (and more alts) you win.

Edit: you know the alt joke kinda feels weak now that the voting has come to a really just point. I like how this tourney rolls. And it's away from the recency bias too.

Advise for the next year:

Let's hide the names of posters too to avoid popularity contests until champion is decided.

 

[RandyForRubio]

I like the way WC did this. Some sort of seeding, no matter how inaccurate, is better than random draw, for a progressively more competitive tourney.

I just wanna complain.

 

[RandyForRubio]

Writeup sent.

 

[Elizah Huge]

Id prefer the 1-16 approach from the draw than having the commish decide the matchups.

I didn't decide ****.

You all knew the rules before we started any of the matchups.

 

[Thee Idiotic Minivan K]

Id prefer the 1-16 approach from the draw than having the commish decide the matchups.

I'd prefer u not be an idiot. He didn't pick the matchups. Read the rules next time!!

 

[Keefe]

Which means that seeding and standings does not affect the outcomes of the latter rounds. If you have a better team (and more alts) you win.

Edit: you know the alt joke kinda feels weak now that the voting has come to a really just point. I like how this tourney rolls. And it's away from the recency bias too.

Advise for the next year:

Let's hide the names of posters too to avoid popularity contests until champion is decided.

How the **** would we do this? How would people know whose turn it is?

 

[addictionary]

How the **** would we do this? How would people know whose turn it is?

A non participant boss gathering picks in a Premium forum. Then naming teams for voting with fake handles.

 

[elan_prodigy]

I'd prefer u not be an idiot. He didn't pick the matchups. Read the rules next time!!

So how were the 1st round matchups decided?

 

[Elizah Huge]

So how were the 1st round matchups decided?

Random.

 

[RandyForRubio]

Why aren't we going yet?

 

[Jack Strop]

Why aren't we going yet?

Remaining participants need time to create more alts.