#2 #31 Milwaukee Bucks
The Bucks find themselves at a crossroad before this draft and free agency period.
They've got new owners, they have a financial background and I guess it's a safe assumption that they'll have an analytical mindset for how to manage the team.
I don't expect them to be hands on, but they'll be public because you know it's cool to be cheered for a change. At least Milwaukee will be cheering until there's relocation rumours.
But that's another story for another year. Like 2020
And then there's a new story with new people cheering.
Mallory Edens already "won the internet" and found her way into every middle aged American basketball fan's borderline pedophile dream.
So visibility is what I expect from the not being influential.
They kept John Hammonds for a reason. He's had increasing success working the draft since selecting Joe Alexander in 2008 as his first lottery pick. In subsequent years he got better and since 2010 he has gotten very close to BPA, with 2012(John Henson) and 2013(Giannis) being actually BPA in restrospect.
I think the reason why he wasn't good in the 2011 draft was the instruction to construct an immediate playoff team, which resulted in trading away their #10 for Captain Jack and #19.
He'll probably have a free reign now, overhaul the roster and rebuild around this year's #2, Giannis, Henson and next year's lottery pick.
In the past previous owner Herb Kohl has been influential in the roster and strategic decisions with his refusal to tank when they were in no-mans land.
And because of that they'll face difficult questions: What to do with their bad contracts?
If they are a no show like in this year, it's no problem to have them on the books, as the'll have to pay $56.7M anyways for the roster.
But there's an IF. Or multiple BIG IFs:
What if....
-OJ Mayo decides to be in shape and actually play for another contract or to get traded
-Larry Sanders retires from barfights, keeps his mouth shut in the locker room and also doesn't have bad luck with another basketball-related injury
-Brandon Knight, John Henson, Nate Wolters and especially GIANNIS keep improving.
-Delfino comes back healthy, Ilyasova becomes an impact player again
-Zaza Pachulia stops rehearsing for "The Invisible Man"
-Khris Middleton continues to outplay his contract big time
and last but not least
-their #2 carries the team on his back
Then you suddenly might have a Eastern Conference borderline playoff team and you really don't want that if you're following the small market long term success blueprint set by San Antonio, Utah and most recently Oklahoma City.
And if they're looking at their fanbase from a realistic standpoint they know they need on court success to win basketball fans back in the area to fill the new arena they're planning to build.
So I expect them to be very active around the draft and in free agency.
Their #31 does have some value when it comes to unloading money.
The key piece is obviously Larry Sanders and with all his recent shenanigans it's hard to tell if they're serious about keeping him or if they want to unload him asap and get future assets in return from a team that hopes they can control his temper with a healthy locker room.
They currently sit at $45.08M bankroll guaranteed for next season and their #2 pick will at another $4.92M to that. So they have arund $13M in cap space to toy with.
And by cap space I mean long term injured players whose contracts they can absorb in exchange for healthy players.
This might mean pairing questionable contracts like Ilyasova, Mayo, Delfino or Pachulia with a potentially good player like Knight. Even if Knight's going to improve even more.
I personally doubt he'll ever be more than a valuable first guard off the bench. His defense is atrocious and his offense doesn't make up for it for him to be a starter.
And I'd totally unload Knight if I had to send 1 valuable asset away, simply because having no point guard ensures that everyone else plays bad which results in less urgency to move more bad contracts and simply can let everyone else who could have been a contributor for the nightmare worst case 8th seed Bucks ruins his value even more and you send their expirings away next summer or next season's draft deadline.
If I'm John Hammond I wouldn't touch John Henson because I feel like he can be a good 1st big off the bench guy like Taj Gibson.
And I'd try to get rid of Sanders like crazy and either draft Embiid #2 or focus on Okafor/Towns Jr/Alexander in next year's draft.
For this year's draft pick they have to take a look at all of the top4, but I feel they will pass on Exum because the often reported synergy between Parker and Giannis would be better as interchangable forwards in the future. Both have playmaking potential with Parker more focused on 1v1 and Giannis being unselfish and a good creator for others.
From what I hear, the next 2 drafts won't be point guard heavy in quality and depth as well but these two could form a playmaking duo in a way that they could stick with Knight as a spot up shooter or add via free agency/lower draft picks.
The case for Wiggins would be a lot of length on the wing and big time defensive potential. The case against Wiggins is that Giannis long range bomb is showing promise, but Wiggins has been shaky in both creating off the dribble and shooting consistency.
If you select him you have to aim for really good shooting at both point guard and one of the bigs. Or they could end up being a really good regular season team that doesn't have another gear in the playoffs because opposite defenses will be daring them to shoot.
But the defensive potential would be off the charts.
The case for Embiid is of course BPA, two way player. Has a lot of range for a Center. A lot of shake. Provides rim protection with his length, smart kid, fast learner. If you take him and he stays healthy he might have a very good career.
In favor of Exum is mainly that next year seems to only contain Mudiay and Jones as quality point guards, and in 2016 there's Malik Newman who according to my 2 minute google research hasn't shown much interest in creating for others yet. Against him is that he's given scouts very little sample size vs quality competition and that max contract point guards usually don't end up in the NBA finals since the rules have been adapted in a way that allows them to attack the rim efficiently(Main beneficiaries have been SG+SF with great ball handling)
I think their BPA list is going to be
Embiid > Parker = Wiggins > Exum. hard to tell which one they'll select because I expect Embiid to go to Cleveland.
With their early 2nd rounder I see them going BPA because they have so many holes on their roster.
To make it quick my list for them would be: Capela, Adams, Jokic, Austin, Inglis, Klimenko
TL;DR
New ownership will bring change in the FO, but Hammond getts his chance because of strong drafting
Bucks should try to send away veterans to not mess with chemistry and unintentional 8th seed contention
They should stick with Giannis and Henson
Pick is most likely going to be Parker or Wiggins
#31 will be BPA