What's new
By:

Coronavirus

Avery said:
Haven’t seen that. You have a link? Not finding anything myself.

Have a 4 hr flight with them late March so would definitely like to not wear one if possible.
Click to expand...

I work for them. Was told by our general manager today.
 
Avery said:
Gotcha. Envious of those flight benefits, hope you get to take advantage of them from time to time.
Click to expand...

Yeah man, it's really why I'm there. My family has been flying more than I have but I've done some cool short trips. Planning to travel for nearly two straight months starting early April.
 
Douchebag K said:
retrospective study that i have shown you before shows negligible difference between those previously infected and those previously infected and who have then had a vaccine. Why would you take another medicine that makes no difference. Where are the long term studies on things like antibody dependence or other effects from taking repeated booster shots ??
Click to expand...
The CDC study under discussion

Just compare the ratios in the last two columns. You can see a large difference between them. Being vaccinated after having the disease significantly improves your chances of avoiding re-infection.

Moved discussion to this thread.
 
Idiotic Minivan wants me to debate the finer points with him after he said that getting the vaccine doesn't stop you from getting COVID.

That's as disingenuous as it gets.

Prove that you're worth having a discussion with instead of saying intentionally misleading things and then falling back on **** you said some other time that was also misleading. It's almost as if obfuscating the facts is beneficial to your objective
 
One Brow said:
The CDC study under discussion

Just compare the ratios in the last two columns. You can see a large difference between them. Being vaccinated after having the disease significantly improves your chances of avoiding re-infection.

Moved discussion to this thread.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes::rolleyes: lololololol those are "large" differences ??????????????? dude you just try way too hard to twist things to your preconceived ideas.

Just face up that your natural immunity denial is unfounded and unscientific. Move on
 
Douchebag K said:
:rolleyes::rolleyes: lololololol those are "large" differences ???????????????
Click to expand...
Large enough that you still cut your chance of reinfection in half. Large enough that you have a significantly reduced viral output if you do get the disease again.

Douchebag K said:
dude you just try way too hard to twist things to your preconceived ideas.
Click to expand...
Projection.

Douchebag K said:
Just face up that your natural immunity denial is unfounded and unscientific.
Click to expand...
When you can show it is, I'll gladly face up to it. There is nothing better than learning something new. Take those numbers and show me how I've misinterpreted them, and I'll learn something new. It's a win-win for me.
 
Natural immunity means that you already have to have been sick. Natural immunity is just fine. But if the goal is to not risk death in the first place, natural immunity for a person who doesn't already have it is the absolute worst option possible by infinity.

Since the vaccine is extraordinarily safe and has varying effectiveness against different strains, but reduces risk of infection, severity of infection, and possibility of retransmission vs all strains, it is the best possible option for everyone, including people who have natural immunity already.

So yay for people who have had COVID and didn't die. Good for them. They should probably still get the vaccine and all recommended boosters.

Making comments about how the vaccine doesn't do anything, or doesn't stop infection, is intentional misleading and is clearly agenda driven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top