I don’t know why you insist on continuing to make a fool out of yourself like this. What does it possibly gain you? You were woefully wrong about Ars Technica as a highly respected outlet for science news. I even provided you the names of some of their staff, and contributors, and their qualifications in the biological sciences. You made a mistake. I called you on it. Just get over it.
You drew a Big Fail hand, of your own free will, because in your excitement and eagerness to post a “gotcha”, you never bothered to read their article on the rejection of germ theory by some. You never bothered, in this instance, to check the algorithm and standards The Factual went with in identifying good sources for information on the coronavirus. Somehow, they are not qualified to do this in your estimation? I’m not sure I have ever seen you actually address any information, and rebut it with your own information. All you do is cry “tabloid”, with no thoughtful rebuttals whatsoever. That’s just never going to cut it. I mean, Ars Technica is right up their with MIT’s journal, and other quality outlets and organizations. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Well, yeah, you are a troll, at least at times, so there’s that, and maybe there is only that. I’d like to think better of you than that, you seem to get along with some other members here, but whatever. The Factual’s list of outlets with reliable and factual coronavirus info was created early in the pandemic, but not much has changed in that regard. Ars Technica is still highly regarded on the subject. And they are well known for the depth of their analysis of scientific subjects. Nothing you say is going to alter that fact.
Edit:
@JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.