Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Yes, your posts should qualify as a hate crime lol.
Lol
So no response to the actual post? Haha. I got ya.
Stumped the ol got an answer for everything stoked.
Yes, your posts should qualify as a hate crime lol.
Lmfao.
Good boy DutchOk. Mr one liner.
Your opinions are these two opinions.
You are an idiot
And good post
Lmao
Wow. Riveting
Try forming a couple coherent paragraphs and I will start taking your insults serious.
Stop being reasonable. ;-)Ya I'm pro-life but I think a woman and her family should have the right to choose. I don't think everyone has to be pro life just cause I am.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Lmao
Gotta love ol Mr One liner.
Takes a split second to read his posts.
Thanks for your contributions One Liner
Lol
So no response to the actual post? Haha. I got ya.
Stumped the ol got an answer for everything stoked.
You are a leftist now btw. You were conservative but Ive watched you change over the years. This site tries to punish those who disagree with the leftist ideology. You caved because of fear and were brainwashed.
I was actually on the left when I started here. Now Im center right because the line moved.
I have the special power to not be brainwashed. Unfortunately its rare.
Im only saying this because I care and there might be hope for you. The real stoked might be in there still.
GoJazz79 hello? Are you there? Hello? Can you hear my voice?
So you protect it like its your weed stash.(was going to go with baby, but we know how libs feel about babies)
Abortion is a disgusting human act. Anything other than the baby had to be aborted to save the life of the female or she was raped, is down right disgusting.
Any time conservatives throw a rape exception in there, you know it's really about patriarchy and controlling women's sexuality, not the sanctity of life.
I disagree completely. One can still be motivated by the sanctity of life but not feel that the status of a fetus is the same as the status of a baby. Such is my view. And in that case it's a matter of weighing the sanctity of the fetus's life against all of the other factors that come into play in the case of rape.Any time conservatives throw a rape exception in there, you know it's really about patriarchy and controlling women's sexuality, not the sanctity of life.
What?
Here let me throw it back at ya.
You know the only reason Democrats are for abortion is to reduce the population of the black race. Throw in the support for immigration and you got a way to reduce the Mexican population by bringing them here and teaching them abortion is good.
Care to talk about these statistics?
I disagree completely. One can still be motivated by the sanctity of life but not feel that the status of a fetus is the same as the status of a baby. Such is my view. And in that case it's a matter of weighing the sanctity of the fetus's life against all of the other factors that come into play in the case of rape.
The most immense and dangerous public scandal in American history is finally cracking open like a ripe pomegranate. The broad swath of the Trump-hating media that has participated in what has amounted to an unconstitutional attempt to overthrow the government are reduced to reporting the events and revelations of the scandal in which they have been complicit, in a po-faced ho-hum manner to impart to the misinformed public that this is as routine as stock market fluctuations or the burning of an American flag in Tehran.
For more than two years, the United States and the world have had two competing narratives: that an elected president of the United States was a Russian agent whom the Kremlin helped elect; and its rival narrative that senior officials of the Justice Department, FBI, CIA, and other national intelligence organizations had repeatedly lied under oath, misinformed federal officials, and meddled in partisan political matters illegally and unconstitutionally and had effectively tried to influence the outcome of a presidential election, and then undo its result by falsely propagating the first narrative. It is now obvious and indisputable that the second narrative is the correct one.
The authors, accomplices, and dupes of this attempted overthrow of constitutional government are now well along in reciting their misconduct without embarrassment or remorse because—in fired FBI Director James Comey’s formulation—a “higher duty” than the oath they swore to uphold the Constitution compelled them. Or—in fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s words—“the threat” was too great. Nevermind that the nature of “the threat” was that the people might elect someone he and Comey disapproved of as president, and that that person might actually serve his term, as elected.
A Long List of Offenders—and Offenses
The extent of the criminal misconduct of the former law enforcement and intelligence chiefs is now notorious, but to make the right point here, it has to be summarized. The fact that the officially preferred candidate lied to federal officials about her emails and acted in outright contempt of Congress and the legal process in the destruction of evidence, was simply ignored by the FBI director, who announced that she would not be prosecuted, though he had no authority to make that determination.
The dossier of salacious gossip and defamatory falsehoods amassed by a retired British spy from the lowest grade of intelligence sources in Russia, commissioned and paid for by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, was circulated to the media by high public officials and cited in illegal and dishonest applications to authorize surveillance of the campaign of the other presidential candidate. A special counsel was empowered on the false pretext of the necessity to get to the bottom of Trump-Russian collusion in the election, of which there was and remains no evidence, because it did not occur and was a complete partisan fabrication.
Aren't most religious folks pro life?
Don't most religious folks believe that when a baby dies it is innocent and gets a free pass into heaven?
So if you were to give a person a choice of starting a life on Earth at a huge disadvantage such as having a mom that doesn't want them, major health defects, drug addicted parents, parents in poverty unable to properly care for you, etc and living in a world full of fear, hate, suicides, sickness, depression, hunger, etc..... Or going to heaven to live in Paradise and perpetual happiness with people you love. Which would you choose?
I know I would choose heaven.
Why would a religious person want to prevent or decrease the chances of the babies from going to heaven?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app