Welp, the draft is before free agency so many of those questions are going to need to be obviated. I really think they'd be a bit more panicked if they thought all of those question marks were valid..
I think were gonna see players selected to be groomed, not to step in and fill any holes anytime soon...
Alec Burks is no question mark, he'd start for many teams IMO. The Burks hysteria here is well beyond logic and reason, frankly it's completely unjustified, lacking perspective and woefully short sighted. Burks is a ****ing key player and a damn good fit with this roster.. he'll really help build/maintain leads off the bench. That unit which closes the 1st and 3rd Q's will be much more dangerous with him on the floor. I fully believe he and Lyles have the potential for great chemistry.
The flamethrower position I've been posting about for a while seems to be more valuable than ever. Just ask any Lakers or Rockets fan about Lou Williams and Eric Gordon. Burks can function as a flamethrower at PG/SG or SF, that type of player is a rare commodity even in todays NBA..
As for the positions;
PG is probably going to be straightforward. It seems like they'll put their eggs in the basket of George Hill and re-sign Mack... How many picks are they going to spend on PG's in the 2010's anyways???
SG is not a strength of this draft and with Hood/Burks and possibly a more expensive Ingles on the book I'm not sure this is a priority. I'd imagine some sort of SG/SF, SF/SG, SG/PG, PG/SG could be more enticing than a pure SG.
SF is an intriguing position. I'm hoping for a SF/PF type(that I've been calling for, for years here)
PF, more specifically PF/C is the position I have a feeling is the most likely to be selected with one of the 1sts. The timing of it with Favors contract just makes sense.
C is seemingly not a priority with Rudy here but the backup C leaves much to be desired IMO. Taking a C in this draft means that the player would be a RFA when Rudy hits UFA, which probably isn't ideal.. I like the idea of drafting a young giant somewhere in the 2nd rd to groom for years in the D-league tho. Perhaps it'd just be to develop a big trade asset. I like that idea tho, Tacko Fall or maybe even Viny Okouo
Yousappha Fall who I posted about in last years thread will probab;y go undrafted (he's auto-eligible this year) but I'd take at least a SL Flier on. He's a legit 7'4" and measured a Gobert-esq 9'9" standing reach.He can run too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYT7BSYs0Uk