Hmm.. may be I have too much of a conscience.. after all, nobody forced CHA to sign Al Jefferson... lol.. it's their choice I guess.
What?
Hmm.. may be I have too much of a conscience.. after all, nobody forced CHA to sign Al Jefferson... lol.. it's their choice I guess.
Not only that but if we lose we don't **** somebody else over. We are not tanking to screw another team out of a pick. They threw games to insure they kept their pick. We will lose because we are going to be young. But they will not intentionally lose just to get a better pick.Well yeah there is a huge difference in that sense, but the main goal is exactly the same - get a top #10 lotto pick.
You can talk about us wanting to give young guys experience, etc, but then GSW also gave Klay plenty of time to play, same with Jenkins, etc.
At the end of the day though, it's all the pick. I'm not complaining though, it's just how the system is set up. It is what it is.
Not only that but if we lose we don't **** somebody else over. We are not tanking to screw another team out of a pick. They threw games to insure they kept their pick. We will lose because we are going to be young. But they will not intentionally lose just to get a better pick.
It kinda cracks me up everytime I think about how mad we were when GSW tanked hard to try and grab Barnes....
But now we'll be using their players (Jefferson, Bierdrins) to tank hard ourselves to try and grab Jabari...
hahaha... oh the irony...
It kinda cracks me up everytime I think about how mad we were when GSW tanked hard to try and grab Barnes....
But now we'll be using their players (Jefferson, Bierdrins) to tank hard ourselves to try and grab Jabari...
hahaha... oh the irony...
GSW purposefully threw games. Jazz are developing young players but I don't think it means we will be trying to lose. Can't see the Jazz trying to lose games the way Golden State did.
There's a big difference between rebuilding and trying to develop young players and tanking for a higher draft pick.
I respectfully disagree.
It is not all about the pick. It's all about evaluation. The FO needs to know what they've got so they can make smart decisions in the draft and/or FA.
Not only that but if we lose we don't **** somebody else over. We are not tanking to screw another team out of a pick. They threw games to insure they kept their pick. We will lose because we are going to be young. But they will not intentionally lose just to get a better pick.
That's why I never banged on GS for tanking. It is what you have to do nowadays.
So, GS just did what SA did...sit your slightly injured players, developed their younger players....we aren't any different.
How about it's both?
Thank the Lord somebody finally gets this.
I LOVE that people think we aren't any different than GS. In Bill Simmons' eyes, we are the same. He tweeted that out, and some people have that in their sigs. We are tanking. If we weren't tanking, we would have resigned Millsap, gotten a good backup pg in here and definitely would NOT have taken Jefferson and Beidrens from GS. We would have "reloaded", as KOC says, around Hayward, Favors and Kanter. Instead, we stripped down the team, and are turning it over to those three with no help.
Anyways, back to the OP, I would accept a horrible season next year. That means after this year, our roster looks like this:
PG - Top 10 pick
SG - Top 10 pick
SF - Top 10 pick
PF - Top 3 pick
C - Top 3 pick
After next year, I fully expect the Jazz to go out, not tank and sign bad bench players, but go after good role players and I expect to be in the playoffs. Hayward, Favors will have 4 season, Kanter 3. Those three had BETTER be able to get you to the playoffs or the Jazz blew those picks. Toss in Burke in his second year, a good bench AND another top 10 pick? We had better be in the playoffs. Even if it is an 8 seed.
I LOVE that people think we aren't any different than GS. In Bill Simmons' eyes, we are the same. He tweeted that out, and some people have that in their sigs. We are tanking. If we weren't tanking, we would have resigned Millsap, gotten a good backup pg in here and definitely would NOT have taken Jefferson and Beidrens from GS. We would have "reloaded", as KOC says, around Hayward, Favors and Kanter. Instead, we stripped down the team, and are turning it over to those three with no help.
There will be growing pains and we will suck for a few years. Have to accept that as part of the process.
I LOVE that people think we aren't any different than GS. In Bill Simmons' eyes, we are the same. He tweeted that out, and some people have that in their sigs. We are tanking. If we weren't tanking, we would have resigned Millsap, gotten a good backup pg in here and definitely would NOT have taken Jefferson and Beidrens from GS. We would have "reloaded", as KOC says, around Hayward, Favors and Kanter. Instead, we stripped down the team, and are turning it over to those three with no help.
Anyways, back to the OP, I would accept a horrible season next year. That means after this year, our roster looks like this:
PG - Top 10 pick
SG - Top 10 pick
SF - Top 10 pick
PF - Top 3 pick
C - Top 3 pick
After next year, I fully expect the Jazz to go out, not tank and sign bad bench players, but go after good role players and I expect to be in the playoffs. Hayward, Favors will have 4 season, Kanter 3. Those three had BETTER be able to get you to the playoffs or the Jazz blew those picks. Toss in Burke in his second year, a good bench AND another top 10 pick? We had better be in the playoffs. Even if it is an 8 seed.
And I love that some people are deluded enough to be unable to see the difference. Jazz are building on their youth and planning for the future. But they will go out and try to win every game. Obviously they wont but they will try.
GS on the other hand was going out and intentionally trying to lose games. They made specific in game adjustments in an effort to lose.
Their is a differnce. I don't give a damn who tells me it is the same. It is not, period.