Hopper
Banned
Just because some types of rudeness are tolerated doesn't mean they all have to be.
If it aint, then it's not "rudenesss" you're crackin down on, it's sumthin else. If routine ridicule and denouncment of, say, religious beliefs, is permitted, encouraged and even required while any such behavior toward atheists is disallowed, discouraged and strictly forbidden, then it would be absurd to say that a crackdown on comments unwelcomed and disapproved of by atheists was a crackdown on "rudeness."
Of course the atheists probably wouldn't see it that way. For many people, rudeness is only rudeness if they think someone is being "rude to" them. As rude as they may be to others, well, that aint rudeness, it's just "fact." Furthermore, they often think it is "rude" for you to fail to share, approve of, and promulgate their opinions and values.
Sayin "no one can be rude to Johnny, but everyone else is fair game," can NOT be a "crackdown on rudeness." It can be an elevation of Johnny to special, protected and favored status, but not a "crackdown on rudeness." The explanation cannot really be "because it's rude." The only credible "explanation" (such as it is) is that it's "because it is Johnny."
One Brown said:I find it hard to believe you don't think such religions exist. I find it unlikely that you can't already name a couple yourself. I find it almost impossible ot believe you can't discover such information on your own. So, it seems to me like you're just trying to call me out.
I didn't say I believed anything. I done told ya I aint no religious scholar, or nuthin. I am interested in passages in holy scripture from religions worldwide which say morality is dependent upon skin color. Is this the "voodoo" religion, or sumthin?
Needless to say, I'm axin you for more than just: "OK; 1. Buddism 2. Judaism 3. Islam, and 4. Christianity.
I'm interested in your basis for making such claims more that I am the mere assertion and enumeration of of your claims.
Last edited: