Burke supposedly left before the media got to the locker room too.
Maybe because he didn't play in the fourth? I didn't even notice that he was out.
Burke is not indispensable to this team...I hope they will trade him asap. We can't afford to have two guards on the floor that can't defend...Burks is more than enough.
I will say this, if the Jazz trade Kanter they're trading away their best offensive post threat since 2007 boozer and late 90s Malone. The dude when given the ball in the post is money. Yes he is a black hole and yes his defense sucks sometimes. But when you give him the rock on the block the dude makes things happen (either a score of a turnover). More often than not, a score.
Post guys with his offensive potential don't grow a dime a dozen. However, look at the opportunity cost. Does he bring in a valuable asset while freeing up PT for Gobert?
I'm glad I'm not Lindsey right now. Because right now I'm probably dealing with a pissed off Burke too in addition to this Kanter situation.
I was thrilled when I saw the guy again on that Adam Sandler movie.your memory is awful. and your reading comprehension is worse. we should trade you for a vanilla ice cd.
But our team as presently constructed needs offensive Fire power. If Kanter hadn't gone off tonight we lose this game by double digits. We were literally overmatched by the Bucks at every other position other than maybe hayward. So until we get some wings healthy, developed, or in a trade, we need Kanter.
I've been on the trade Kanter bandwagon for a while. And still am mostly because I don't think we can match what someone is going to offer him this summer. However, if we unload Kanter and don't get a good offensive weapon for the perimeter in return, we might not win another game this season.
Playing hayward with a bunch of rookies and d leaguers isn't a recipe for success. We flat out can't score without Hood and Burks.
We could have shaq and malone in their primes and still suck because we must rely on such poor perimeter players. Bless their hearts they play hard. But they ain't any good.
If Hayward goes down this team will struggle to score 60 pts in a game. Defense wins championships but you first need an offense to just get into the playoffs.
I'm not willing to break up who I see as the Jazz core group moving forward. The only comparable piece I can think of in trades for All Star caliber players are Wiggins for Love and maybe Favors for D-Will. Maybe, maybe Vicuvek for Howard. But I think that's really projecting. Philly actually gave away more, IMO, than L. A. did to get Howard. Harden cost spare parts and a lucky draft pick (that slightly salvaged it for OKC.) I'd give the rights to Kanter, Burke and a slew of draft picks. He's still growing, and his ceiling is unreal. . . but he might never reach that. I think a package similar to Harden's young player w/ potential and two firsts is about right.
Most of you are nauseating. Can someone say something decent about Kanter? Holy **** this is the most political bunch of nancies in the NBA.
I think we get great value at 18/12. Great considering our fan base thinks he's worth a shot glass of Sunny D.
Kanter needs to eat some Doner Kebabs, sutlac, karniyarik, and kisir to gain about 30 lbs and bully people in the post more. "you can't move him" - some random nike hoops summit announcer
I agree, guy is putting up 23 pts and 16 rebounds and people are bitching about his passing. Jazz fans love hating on players. Now all of a sudden people are loving Dante again. Kanter is a guy who can score with guys hanging all over him and can make outside shots. I just think people have gone way over the top on the criticism towards him. It is beyond ridiculous.
For all of the trade Kanter talk (and I'm one who predicted the Jazz would not resign him), David Locke (who I find to be a very credible and reliable source) has on a few occasions said that one quite possible outcome is that Kanter elects not to opt out at the end of the year, plays one more year on his rookie contract, and then goes the full, unrestricted FA route the following year. This is, for example, what Greg Monroe did. I know some people seem to think that there's always a robust market for skilled big men, but, judging from Monroe's case, (he did not receive a great deal of interest from other teams contributing to his decision not to opt out) this is not necessarily true. Frankly, for me, this is the ideal scenario. Rather than having to decide whether and how much money to commit money to Kanter, let this play out one more year, at which point we can make a more informed decision.