jimmy eat jazz
Well-Known Member
It's not "opting out." The Jazz extend a qualifying offer to make him a RFA. Kanter can choose to sign it or not. IINM, the qualifying offer for Enes is $7.5M, which is different than what the figure used in calculating his cap hold. I do agree with you that Enes could choose that option. Risky? Perhaps (chance of injury). But the payoff would be that he'd be an UNRESTRICTED free agent in the very summer the cap is going to skyrocket.
This is the WORST scenario for Utah. If they can lock him up for 4 years even at $15M/per, that's a much better deal than paying him $7.5M next season, then having to try to outbid other teams if they want to keep him (when a max contract for him would be $20M/per). But if Kanter really believes he'll be a max player, he'd actually be wise to wait. Over the course of 4 seasons, he could make almost $8M more by waiting, plus then have the next season at $20M. Maybe the Jazz could offer him an opt out clause in 3 years like Hayward has in his deal. Kanter gets the same amount of money over 3 years, then has the chance to get a big contract after that. Whatever the contract, it will eventually come down to choosing to keep Favors or Kanter - unless one of them makes the choice for Utah by leaving as an UFA.
Thanks for the correction. You may be right about what the best scenario is. Another thing Locke thinks may be important is that Kanter is his agent's only client, in which case, if this agent want more clients, he needs to hit a home run with Kanter. (Agents, as we know, exert a lot of behind the scenes power.)
In any case, I'd be willing to bid adieu to Kanter, if that's best for the future, but I want to give him more time, as I think he's no where near his ceiling at the moment. If I had to choose today, however, between Kanter and Gobert, it would be Gobert.