What's new

Jazz vs. Mavs in round one

I think it's the other way around. The real contenders are good enough during the regular season to finish in the top 3. Seeding doesn't determine the contender, the contenders rise in the seeding.

That's the point. The idea that the regular season doesn't define the postseason is ridiculous. You are likely your seed and therefore if you're a five seed, you're not a contender.

The Jazz are a five seed for a reason. It's not for a lack of trying to be good, like some assume, and rather a result of the team not being as good as advertised prior to the season.

But you can look at a team's seed and pretty much know right away they're not a contender solely because their seeding is a result of 82 games and real contenders don't typically struggle consistently enough throughout the season to drop that far.

The one exception is Houston from 1995 and those anomaly years I mentioned where the Knicks won the East as an 8th seed.
 
Are people really getting upset that we are speculating over his injury lmao? He’s literally out for Game 1 I already told you guys this.
 
Are people really getting upset that we are speculating over his injury lmao? He’s literally out for Game 1 I already told you guys this.
I just think it's funny when I go to a Mavs forum, and everybody is like "I bet he's back by Game 1 or 2", people talking about the time they had a calf strain and were back on their feet within a few days, treating good news as gospel while making fun of bad news.

Then I go here and people are like "Yeah he's done for the series, look at how bad it looks, once time I had a calf strain and I was done for a month, yeah I know this actual doctor is disagreeing with me on social media but I don't care what he thinks", etc....

Didn't realize we had so many doctors among both fanbases - it's kind of intimidating.
 
I just think it's funny when I go to a Mavs forum, and everybody is like "I bet he's back by Game 1 or 2", people talking about the time they had a calf strain and were back on their feet within a few days, treating good news as gospel while making fun of bad news.

Then I go here and people are like "Yeah he's done for the series, look at how bad it looks, once time I had a calf strain and I was done for a month, yeah I know this actual doctor is disagreeing with me on social media but I don't care what he thinks", etc....

Didn't realize we had so many doctors among both fanbases - it's kind of intimidating.
87.358% of sports fans are doctors
 
Doncic will be out for Games 1 and 2 at a minimum. Jazz need to try to win both those games. Let's move on and talk about lineups...

Mavs need to start their regular guys -- Brunson / Dinwiddie / Bullock / Finney-Smith / Powell. They need to put their best scorers on the floor, and at the same time they can't put themselves in a position to get completely crushed on the boards. Luka not only leads the Mavs in scoring and assists, he also leads the team in rebounding at 9 rpg. Jazz will have an opportunity to crash the offensive boards. One of Powell or Kleber will need to be on the floor to contend with Gobert/Whiteside. If they really play DFS at the 5, he'll be giving up 6 inches and 40 lbs on our guys. Even if Gobert doesn't punish that matchup consistently, Whiteside will. They might try to buy some minutes with Marquese Chriss in their frontcourt.

With Luka out of the lineup, the Mavs' depth becomes an issue. Off the bench, they have Josh Green, Davis Bertans and Maxi Kleber, which doesn't give them a lot of scoring punch. Those guys average 7ppg, 5ppg and 5ppg, respectively, so they're going to have to try to turn it up a notch. Don't be surprised if Sterling Brown and Frank Ntilikina play some minutes, though neither is an efficient shooter.

DFS is the Mavs' best individual defender, and he'll likely try to defend Mitchell. However, both Mike and Donovan will probably try to bring Dwight Powell into a pick-and-roll with Gobert and get the switch onto Powell who is a mediocre defender away from the rim. The other guy to attack is Brunson, simply because he's 6'1" with a 6'4" wingspan, and guys like Mitchell and Clarkson will just shoot over him. If Bertans is on the floor, then obviously our guys will attack him and make him Peking Duck.

With Luka out of the lineup, the Jazz's main advantage comes from Mitchell and Gobert in the starting lineup, and the Jazz's quality depth off the bench. In this scenario, the Jazz's bench production should really be +15 or better over the Mavs' bench. The Jazz should also have a pretty consistent rebound advantage, if the Jazz keep the Mavs' guards off the boards.

If I were the Jazz, I would start House ahead of O'Neale. The reason is that the Mavs have a very perimeter-oriented attack, especially without Luka working out of screen/roll actions. House could guard Dinwiddie, while Mitchell guards Bullock on the wing. This would also help keep Mitchell fresher to attack on the other end. So the Jazz would put Conley on Brunson, Mitchell on Bullock, House on Dinwiddie, Bojan on Finney-Smith, and Gobert on Powell. Whether he starts or not, House should be guarding Dinwiddie when he's in the game. Dinwiddie will need to score 25+ every night for the Mavs to have a chance at keeping up with the Jazz's offense.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top