Kanter is ripped

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Not giving details about my athletic history, but I once got down to 3.3% body fat and was bleeding from nose regularly and ears a couple times. Was hospitalized for 2 weeks. Kanter looks healthy, lean, fit, and muscular .. but not under 5%.

How can one give details to something that does not exist?

 

[Deleted member 848]

Not giving details about my athletic history, but I once got down to 3.3% body fat and was bleeding from nose regularly and ears a couple times. Was hospitalized for 2 weeks. Kanter looks healthy, lean, fit, and muscular .. but not under 5%.

You used to do heroin?

 

[zbone]

Not giving details about my athletic history, but I once got down to 3.3% body fat and was bleeding from nose regularly and ears a couple times. Was hospitalized for 2 weeks. Kanter looks healthy, lean, fit, and muscular .. but not under 5%.

Yes. 3% fat is actually borderline lethal level of fat. Bodybuilders when in competition form are in 3-3.5% fat range.

 

[MVP]

Classic AKMVP. Remember when he was trying to convince everyone that Hayward shouldn't have even gone top 15?? Saying that Players like PPatt would've been better selections at #9?

Keep making assumptions after a player plays for a single season, it seems to be going super well for ya.

Classic dalamon. Putting words in my mouth. I never said what you trying to say here dude. I said Jazz missed out on better players like P.George. I said there were numerous rookies who had better season then Hayward - Patrick Patterson included. So please, get your facts straight.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Classic dalamon. Putting words in my mouth. I never said what you trying to say here dude. I said Jazz missed out on better players like P.George. I said there were numerous rookies who had better season then Hayward - Patrick Patterson included. So please, get your facts straight.

Please. You clearly insinuated that players picked several spots ahead of him would have been better options or the 9th pick. Not gonna bother gathering the post now, Ive already embarrassed you enough with it.

 

[MVP]

Please. You clearly insinuated that players picked several spots ahead of him would have been better options or the 9th pick. Not gonna bother gathering the post now, Ive already embarrassed you enough with it.

lol, what is this nonsense? You embarrassing yourself by pulling stuff out of your *** kid. To early to have memory loss, are you sure you do not need your brain checked? I repeat one more time. I said there were numerous rookies drafted after Hayward who had better rookie season then him. Nothing what you are assuming or trying to put on me. Stop it.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Yep, O'Connor is genius at trading and drafting in second round but it is mystery why he is so horrible when it comes to drafting in first round ( especially in lottery)

AK was drafted by Layden not O'Connor. Dwill over C.Paul to me was and is bad mistake. Hayward has shown nothing yet to say he was worth 9th pick. Humphries and Snyder when you could have had big Al and Josh Smith? Horrible!!! Lopez over Parker or Arenas? Ridiculous! Borchardt over Boozer? Crap! and so on. anybody remembers Almond, Pavlovic?.. Why none of O'Connor's first round picks in 2000-2009 are with Jazz anymore if he drafted good??? Only Hayward so far on rookie deal. And I think Kanter was bad pick as well but that one is yet to be seen.

And here is the hook line and sinker, really.

Why sudden love for Hayward? What has he done so far? Few good games at the end of the season when nothing mattered?? His rookie season stats are way worse then some other players drafted behind him like Ed Davis, L.Fields or P.Patterson for example...
And you guys have very short memory, O'Connors first drafted pick for Jazz was DeShawn Stevenson. AK was drafted by Layden.

You say his first round picks suck, including his pick at 2010. You then list off players that played better than him who were picked after 9. CLEAR INSINUATION. I know you and your type-riddled posts strongly indicate that proper English isn't your strength, but please try to keep up.

 

[MVP]

And here is the hook line and sinker, really.


You say his first round picks suck, including his pick at 2010. You then list off players that played better than him who were picked after 9. CLEAR INSINUATION. I know you and your type-riddled posts strongly indicate that proper English isn't your strength, but please try to keep up.

Thanks for proving that I was right and you pulled this stuff >

Classic AKMVP. Remember when he was trying to convince everyone that Hayward shouldn't have even gone top 15?? Saying that Players like PPatt would've been better selections at #9?

out of your ***. Great job kid.

 

[TheSilencer1313]

I thought it was funny how dalamon quoted you from so long ago! Lolz

Ever thought about running for office AKMVP?

 

[Deleted member 848]

Thanks for proving that I was right and you pulled this stuff > out of your ***. Great job kid.

Are you sure you passed grade 9 english class??

Classic AKMVP. Remember when he was trying to convince everyone that Hayward shouldn't have even gone top 15?? Saying that Players like PPatt would've been better selections at #9?

Keep making assumptions after a player plays for a single season, it seems to be going super well for ya.

My derivation from this statement comes from the fact that you YOURSELF stated that Gordon Hayward was a terrible pick at 9th overall. In this thread, you say that you only think we missed on 'better players like Paul George'. Two things:

a) You never singled out Paul George as the clear-cut better player when you were listing players we missed out on. HENCE

--> There must have been OTHER PLAYERS that you think we missed out on, in order for this pick to have been considered terrible.

- you then promptly list a bunch of other players who had better rookie seasons than Hayward


After taking note of this, my next post in this thread was:

Please. You clearly insinuated that players picked several spots ahead of him would have been better options or the 9th pick. Not gonna bother gathering the post now, Ive already embarrassed you enough with it.

Just give up already. Keep clinging to the fact that 'oh awesome, you didn't say word-for-word that we should have picked a specific player at 9th overall'. The rest of us completely understand that this is what you meant with your above posts, as well as understanding how utterly full-of-**** your ball-analytical skills are, if you think that Gordon at 9th overall was a terrible pick.

 

[MVP]

Kid, you put words in my mouth and now trying to look for excuses??? Point is, I did not say ******** you desperately trying to accuse me. Whatever sick conclusions you are trying to make they are not close to what was said originally.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Kid, you put words in my mouth and now trying to look for excuses??? Point is, I did not say ******** you desperately trying to accuse me. Whatever sick conclusions you are trying to make they are not close to what was said originally.

Keep spinnin' it boy, you're almost there!!!



I am patting myself on the back for sticking to this conversation for so long. Not sure why I expect reasonable dialogue out of someone with the English speaking skills of Enes Kanter himself.