@OneLove.....your question is the mainspring of this theme.
Perhaps the most dismal aspect of our fascist modern era of secular humanism/progressive "world management" ideology, is the denial of the value of Life. The whole of the history of the twentieth century, the last fifty years of the nineteenth, and up until about now... has been set out ideologically, pedagogically, as imperative transcendent Truth, a Truth that denies God or any self-existing reality such as a "Life-Force", even that which the communist-compliant naturalist VI Vernadsky wrote about.
Vernadsky recorded roots emitting photons of light, light that was essential to the photochemistry required for growth, even underground....rocks undergoing organic change.... all kinds of minerals in geological processes becoming something supportive of Life, where no such support existed before. Some of these processes were necessary pre-conditions to the formation of the first biomolecular components of things we would call "living". They were not the result of statistical probabilities or chemical reactions per se, and could not be considered "random", but were actually purposed events. Hence, the necessity for claiming the existence of a "Life-Force".
todays scientists, largely trying to comply with evolutionary theory, are nevertheless finding such processes happening, which they say augments the probabilities for their theories..... still something "happening" for reason, purposed reason, driven who God-knows-what fundamental "Life-Force".
Some more religiously-motivated "scientists", trying to develop explanations consistent with their personal idiosyncratic concepts of Biblical texts, argue for "intelligent design". I consider their position to be about as "scientific" as evolutionary theorists trying to develop explanations consistent with their ideology. It is circuitous logic, unscientific in nature, hammering away at reality to make it fit a concept simple enough to satisfy ourselves that we "know".
Older religions such as those of the India subcontinent, the south of Asia and China, have long resorted to "nature" or "the way things are" as a sort of god-concept. We are part of a process, the process is beyond our knowing, we must accept the process and align ourselves with it. The concept of karma is the idea of virtue. We reap what we sow. Some say Jesus brought such values into the Judeo-Christian construct..... who knows where Man first conceived it.... long before any historical or archaeological evidence we know of so far....
I FIND THAT BELIEVING IN A FUNDAMENTAL REALITY THAT GOES DEEPER THAN OUR THEORIES IS NECESSARY, BECAUSE ALL OUR THEORIES SO FAR ARE PRETTY MUCH CRAP.
Marxists love to set up straw man arguments... of their own invention... to prove somehow that their version of reality is "Truth". I find that Marxism is a cheap vaudeville routine, a puppetshow of sorts, that has no contact with any reality. It is chiefly exploited by fascists, the worst sort of statists, as a sort of mesmerizing propaganda routine.
really, really stupid stuff. How could anyone really believe it? Well, the purpetrators of it at the top really don't believe it. If you believe it, you are a dupe. It's nothing but a big lie. And the little folk are the big dupes.
But the idea of "God" is something else. Is there some physical entity in existence, anywhere, with a kind of power to effect creation or create an objectively true moral reality?
At the most primal level, that reality is "Love". It is the "Life-Force", the how and why of how we came into being as we are. Yes, there are negative defining limits, and a positive kernel of Truth.
The Catholics, in their Trinity concept, sought to entail as the almighty creator of everything, their God of scripture. The Trinity would be a whole 'nuther essay. Mormons, in their "Heavenly Father" concept, sought to define "God" as a human being of transcendent principles.... virtues entailing creative powers.... which we ourselves could aspire towards. In either case, and in every other human concept of God, the origin actually eludes us. It is an assertion of a sort of operator, necessary to reality.... a sort of "Theory of Everything" that defies reduction to a mathematical equation.
But even that most primal of definitions also defines ourselves, in our humanity..... and perhaps all life. There exists the impulse to create, to propagate, to extend, to develop, to progress.
People who deny this fundamental reality are the worst of liars in making the claim to be "progressives", and the worst of deceived, delusional cretins to equate their campaign to limit Life with "progress". They are pure hellish regressives, they are the adherents of the worst of oppressive regimes throughout history.
MAGA, the "Make America Great Again" slogan, was a plucking of the CFR fascist lion's whiskers. A political crusade to shut down human progress, to reduce human population, to place all mankind under non-elective modern slavery has been offended by the so-called populist ignoramuses who believe mankind can have a better life.
@OneLove, an ordinary gardener surely should see the value of propagating life.
And, I just can't resist a bit of humor.
Gardeners, I am told, actually know a lot.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078841/
Some folks are equating Trump with Chauncey Gardiner in the movie "
Being There":
http://deadline.com/2017/03/donald-trump-peter-sellers-chauncey-gardiner-being-there-1202047747/
Of course, when you have Meryl Streep and Robert Redford invoking such nonsense in exciting the anti-Trumpists to riot, it's like sock puppets with straw for brains explaining "God".
