Not trying to get involved in an online fight, just find this funny since counting is literally 1st grade ****.
Anyway, re: the trade. Definitely something to consider if Toronto would be willing to do it. The reason it has to at least be considered, imo, is because the team has clearly shown it is ready to legitimately compete & because Hayward can opt out in 2 years. Personally, I would only do so if we also intended to trade Exum for another player that could start at either the 2 or 3, as I feel like since Exum has already been made the starting PG, it would be counterproductive to his development to put him back on the bench. Imo, we need to either "go for it" over the next two years or continue developing our core. I think it makes most sense to continue developing Exum as our starting PG as he likely holds more value by attempting to get him to reach his potential than anything we would receive in return in a trade. Also, the 2nd half of this season proved that we can still be competitive without getting ideal production from our PG position, which should improve next year. I would only do the trade if we are unable to move up in the draft & I also think Lowry's age has to be taken into consideration as we have a young core that is still improving while Lowry has likely peaked. Ultimately, I would only do it under the right circumstances: being able to acquire an all-star caliber 5th starter to play alongside Lowry, Hayward, Favors, & Gobert as well as being unable to move up for 1 of Russell, Mudiay, Hezonja, Winslow, or Johnson. We should compete for a playoff spot regardless of what off-season moves we make, no need to take short cuts. We should only trade significant assets for a young player with all-star potential, who can develop along with our core over the next 5+ years.