I think Lyles will get ahead of Diaw in the rotation by mid-season, in large part because he rebounds more, though he's not at that level of playmaking just yet. I can't see Lyles not getting 20+ minutes.
Defensive goals
The Jazz want to be an elite team defensively, top-two in the NBA. In order to do so, they'll have to be responsible on and off the ball, a top focus of training camp.
"The guy guarding the ball needs to be accountable," Snyder said about his defensive system. "And then if that doesn't happen, we all have to have his back, not just once, but over the course of the possession. We want our guys to be on a string."
If everyone is healthy, Ingles, Mack, Neto, Bolomboy and Withey(if he's the 15th player) are garbage time guys.
Quin mentioned in his interview that Hayward and Favors could both see 4th quarter rest if the subs are holding a good lead.
I also like the Favors, Johnson, Hayward, Hill and Hood lineup. I think we'll see a lot of it.
240 mins total
Favors 30, Gobert 28, Diaw 15, Lyles 23
Hill 24, Exum 24
Hayward 30, Hood 24, Johnson 22, Burks 20
For those who say 30 is not enough for Gotdon and Derrick, check out some SA regular season averages.
Rumblings out of camp that Joe Johnson might get more minutes than expected, especially early in the season.
I think Lyles will get ahead of Diaw in the rotation by mid-season, in large part because he rebounds more, though he's not at that level of playmaking just yet. I can't see Lyles not getting 20+ minutes.
Here's another way to do it. Put in the TOTAL amount of minutes you expect each player to play for the season. It needs to add up to 19680. As a bonus, you get a 538 style win projection.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16qGj94utkG8BoSIsGgHhfig1evvxruYN4C8ProPl3Ds/edit?usp=sharing
You took the words right out of my mouth.In order to get the correct minutes distribution I should have used the convolution formula and then transformed it into pascal's triangle in order to be able to factor it using the neyman pearson lemma to get the data approximately normal so I can find the sufficient statistic and then communicate that statistic to David Locke so he can consult Kevin Pelton for the bayesian estimator and make sure that it is cauchy. If Pelton confirms I can use the poisson distribution to get an approximation for the taylor expansion of the transition matrix so I can use markov chains and use that to get the stationary probabilities of the matrix.
Agreed.Lyles is the Truth.
Pretty good..... And pretty fair I think.Hill 28 Exum 20
Hood 30 Burks 18
Hayward 32 Johnson 16
Favors 24 Lyles 22 Johnson 2
Gobert 29 Favors 8 Diaw 11
That's the best I could do, ignoring injuries. No minutes for Mack, Neto, Ingles, Withey and Bolomboy.
This looks pretty good. I imagine that Exum's minutes will start going up a bit as the season progresses (obviously at the expense of Hill) and that we eventually see a trade involving one or more of the guys getting little to no playing time (plus Burks).Hill 28 Exum 20
Hood 30 Burks 18
Hayward 32 Johnson 16
Favors 24 Lyles 22 Johnson 2
Gobert 29 Favors 8 Diaw 11
That's the best I could do, ignoring injuries. No minutes for Mack, Neto, Ingles, Withey and Bolomboy.
Pretty good..... And pretty fair I think.
Don't think anyone really bitches about their minutes too much in your scenario other than maybe Burks. But 18 minutes isn't horribly low and there would be games that he played more due to foul trouble and blowouts and injuries and stuff.
It's just hard to take anyone's minutes and give them to Alec, unless you're playing him at the 1 and you take out Dante (bad idea imo). Joe will be getting 18mpg, Rodney and Hayward can't have their minutes budged.
Honestly I think 18mpg will be pretty damn good for Alec. Microwave type role with the team, if he's on then Rod or Dante can sit down
Hill 28 Exum 20
Hood 30 Burks 18
Hayward 32 Johnson 16
Favors 24 Lyles 22 Johnson 2
Gobert 29 Favors 8 Diaw 11
That's the best I could do, ignoring injuries. No minutes for Mack, Neto, Ingles, Withey and Bolomboy.