M Med_Phys Well-Known Member Yesterday at 8:10 PM #721 Yes, but Utah got 1-2-3-4 and the next 139 combinations. Why isn't it a random set of combinations?
SoberasHotRod Well-Known Member 2025 Award Winner Yesterday at 8:18 PM #722 Med_Phys said: Yes, but Utah got 1-2-3-4 and the next 139 combinations. Why isn't it a random set of combinations? Click to expand... Statistically speaking it shouldn't matter. It would however make it easier to rig.
Med_Phys said: Yes, but Utah got 1-2-3-4 and the next 139 combinations. Why isn't it a random set of combinations? Click to expand... Statistically speaking it shouldn't matter. It would however make it easier to rig.