What's new

Obama Might Lose This

After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?
 
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?

I like rubber gloves, I spose.
 
Last edited:
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?

I hope you like the snap of a rubber glove because that's exactly what you're going to get over the next decade.
 
Think again for the first time.

Let's see, I own a few incandescent light bulbs and it's totally legal to use them. Plus it was a Republican who passed that ban in the first place. I've never seen a law to ban what car a person can drive. There are still a few jackasses who still drive Hummers around here. As for food there is hardly any sort of ban on food.

And even if what you said was true at least it's just a ban. The right prefers to throw people in jail for activities they deem to be immoral.
 
After 9 pages, I'd like to declare that I'd rather pay for ten rectal scopings performed atop matress springs inside a dirty Russian brothel basement before giving one **** who wins this election. Tomata tomatia, ya know?

Yeah right. You pray every night, like all the other Mormons, that Mitt buys his way into the Whitehouse.
 
Let's see, I own a few incandescent light bulbs and it's totally legal to use them. Plus it was a Republican who passed that ban in the first place. I've never seen a law to ban what car a person can drive. There are still a few jackasses who still drive Hummers around here. As for food there is hardly any sort of ban on food.

And even if what you said was true at least it's just a ban. The right prefers to throw people in jail for activities they deem to be immoral.

That ain't the truth.:

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Pub.L. 110-140[1] originally named the Clean Energy Act of 2007) is an Act of Congress concerning the energy policy of the United States. As part of the Democratic Party's 100-Hour Plan during the 110th Congress,[2] it was introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative Nick Rahall of West Virginia, along with 198 cosponsors.

There is a Titanic load of Democratic Party acts and policies that encroach on/restrict my personal freedoms.
 
Yeah right. You pray every night, like all the other Mormons, that Mitt buys his way into the Whitehouse.

Then I guess Harry Reid prays for that every night as well. That crap is beneath you Pearl.

Do most Mormons want Mitt to win? Of course. Do all of them? No. Do the ones that all want him to win pray for it? No.
 
That ain't the truth.:



There is a Titanic load of Democratic Party acts and policies that encroach on/restrict my personal freedoms.

It's absolutely the truth. Who controlled the Executive branch in 2007? It certainly wasn't passed with a filibuster proof majority.

And what personal freedoms of yours are being banned from the Democratic Party? You should at least be able to come up with 10 or so if there's a Titanic load.
 
Yeah, but unlike Reagan's War on Drugs there aren't thousands of people in prison for possessing tiramisu.

If they want my tiramisu (haha, spell check recommended pastrami) they can pry it from my cold, fat, dead hands.
 
It's absolutely the truth. Who controlled the Executive branch in 2007? It certainly wasn't passed with a filibuster proof majority.

Seriously? If you are going to blame Bush for a Democrat Party sponsored bill there is no where to go from here. Get back to your pot.
 
Back
Top