Literally anyone can do this though.
*Jazz are winning games without Gobert*
Well Gobert must not be important! Easiest analysis ever
Or
I’m glad the Jazz are beating these (bad) teams but we know Gobert is an amazing defender and we won’t go anywhere without him.
What the better take? What took more analysis? And most importantly, which was correct?
After the Cavs trades at the deadline you could say “wow they beat the Celtics and Thunder on the road and they look like they are having a great time and playing very well. Cavs are back.” Easy
Or you could’ve said “New team playing hard with eachother for the first few games, but how about we see them play more than two games, because they didn’t get much better talent wise.”
If you want to say that all you’re doing is evaluating the exact second we are living in at the time of any of your posts then okay. But I’m not sure why anyone should care about analysis that anyone on Earth is capable of.