What's new

Should #47 hang from the rafters at ESA

Can someone provide a link to historical Jazz stats? Such as total Jazz points by player, blocks, rebounds, that kind of stuff. I Can't find anything like that. I think you have to look at those kind of numbers before you can say if AK deserves it or not and also compare his numbers and achievements to the other Jazz players that have had their jerseys retired.

I also think the uniqueness of his number improves his chances of having it retired.
 
I still want AK back on the team next year, but even if he doesn't play for us again I think he earned the honor.
 
This sounds familiar. I wonder where I've read this before? And to think, I was just about to rep you. Good thing I didn't, as I would never do anything to stop one from achieving their goals.

If you read that goal before i am totally unaware of it. But i do appreciate your honoring my effort.

Started this thread just to verify in my mind what the general population of Jazz fandom would say. Just about dead on with my expectations. No player (body) should have his number retired without at least a majority approval of the fan base. This will not happen with Andrei and some of us will be sorry, but the majority rules.
 
The fact that you need to ask this question I think answers the question for you and that answer is No. If you are even debating retiring #47, then you better retire #8, #5, possibly #13 as well.

Which wouldn't be surprising. This is the Jazz we're talking about they retire everybody's jersey. Even people that never played for the Jazz.
 
If Kirilenko plays another couple of years for us, then I would say defrinitely. Currently, I think he is a borderline case.
 
As i expected about 5-1 against this proposal. When the public perceives someone is grossly overpaid and not earning those obscene amounts they can become pretty merciless. But no individual should have his number retired when the vast majority of the fan base doesn't agree with giving them the honor. Sorry Andrei. But i will always believe he earned it. In my mind 47 flies from the rafters.
 
As i expected about 5-1 against this proposal. When the public perceives someone is grossly overpaid and not earning those obscene amounts they can become pretty merciless. But no individual should have his number retired when the vast majority of the fan base doesn't agree with giving them the honor. Sorry Andrei. But i will always believe he earned it. In my mind 47 flies from the rafters.

So do the Jazz have 8 fans or something?
 
Can someone provide a link to historical Jazz stats? Such as total Jazz points by player, blocks, rebounds, that kind of stuff. I Can't find anything like that. I think you have to look at those kind of numbers before you can say if AK deserves it or not and also compare his numbers and achievements to the other Jazz players that have had their jerseys retired.

I also think the uniqueness of his number improves his chances of having it retired.

I think this is what you are looking for:

https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/UTA/leaders_career.html
 
So do the Jazz have 8 fans or something ?

Sorry, i may be obtuse but i didn't understand this comment. Would you care to explain it to me?

5-1 is a ratio. You did understand that ? Anyway then you should have wrote " so do the Jazz have 6 fans or something ?
 
The less I am forced to remember that giant of softness, the chances he cost this team, and the sideshow that he was, the better.
 
I'm someone who's gone on record saying that, at the time - Kirilenko's max-extension in 2004 made quite a bit of sense (to reemphasize: in hindsight it was a mistake, but at the time it actually seemed like the logical move) but there's no way AK should have his jersey retired.

He ranks favorably in career numbers with the Jazz:
-7th in games played
-6th in scoring
-7th in rebounds, 5th in assists
-2nd in blockss
-4th in steals
-4th in FT's made
-10th in double-doubles.

However, the impact he made in the overall success of the franchise wasn't larger than the ones made by Deron Williams, Carlos Boozer or Mehmet Okur. If you retire AK's number at this point then those other 3 players deserve their numbers retired and that just can't happen.

That said, I was looking through some old games the other day and reminded just how good AK was from 03-04 through 05-06 when the Jazz relied on him to play a much larger role. He had games where he was literally all-over the place, he looked like a shotblocking Scottie Pippen flying around the court. The inability to keep that up when we transitioned to a Boozer-DWill team will likely result in his career being viewed as a disappoinment, but he was as unique a talent as there was in the NBA when he was on his game the first 5 seasons of his career.
 
Phil Johnson gave the best arguement when he told Jazz nation AK was lazy didn't work hard and was mentally weak.

Next topic.

...rather than hang a klinko jersey from the rafters....I think all Jazz fans stupid enough to buy one should bring them to a designated Jazz home game.....and have a great big bonfire in the middle of the court!
 
Back
Top