radiohegel
Guest
I think it's a pretty apt descriptor, as far as analogies go. And with clarification, it shouldn't be anywhere near this much of a problem.Right. My argument is that there is significant enough ambiguity about the language that Cy could have forestalled a lot of pushback by using different language, or by conceding that using "punt" is ambiguous enough to confuse more than one poster on the board. Instead, he was defensive, and even though he had a case to be made, there was enough linguistic breakdown that he could have just said "ok, let's not use the word punt."
Plus, defending your use of a particular analogy can be half the fun of making it, in the first place.
Frankly, it seems like the real issue here has more to do with certain people wanting for Cy to have said something stupid.