DX did a pretty good job in picking his best case scenario. Michael Beasley with intangibles/no attitude.
He's not going to handle it like a LeBron or Durant but if you close-out on him can definitely put it on the deck. The big question I have with him is how well can he defend on the perimeter? Can he chase guys around screens? That said - in this draft the things he does well significantly outweigh the things he may struggle with.can williams really dribble?
Draftexpress.com said:Best Case: Michael Beasley W/perfect Intangibles
Worst Case: More Athletic Antawn Jamison
my roommate is an arizona alum so I watched the Wildcats play over thirty times in teh last two years.
And this guy is just can't miss. Worst case scenario, we're talking a better version of Beasley. Best case scenario is Paul Pierce.
Williams actually reminds me a lot of Pierce, because they both kinda played a lot of power forward in college. And they both have really great body control.
Williams has an incredible first step, and his ball handling skills show potential even though they need work. His jumpshot has a slow release, but its very accurate. And this is something he added to his game over the summer.
The really impressive thing about Williams is that he's an incredibly hard worker. I've never seen a college basketball player improve like that in two years. He played a good portion of last season with a brace over his strong hand, and during that time he showed off his ability to do things with his off hand.
He's a competitor and a hard worker and his teammates love him. It's somewhat rare to see all three at the college level.
Also, the comparison to millsap is very superficial. There's a reason Williams is going top three and Millsap went in the second round. Derrick Williams is much much quicker and more explosive than Millsap and has much more advanced shooting and ball handling. Think more like Danny Granger than Paul Millsap.
Awesome. I feel better about him after hearing this. Either Kanter or Willaims, at 3 the Jazz can't miss.